Wikipedia:Peer review/Operation Tennessee Waltz/archive1

I think this has the chance to be a great article. 68.59.194.244 02:10, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)

That may be true, but it's an ongoing event, and information is still coming in. Maybe we should let it settle a bit first before improving it. --khaosworks 02:18, Jun 1, 2005 (UTC)
No red links please. Also, the link to TBI is a disambig page with the Tennessee Bureau as a red link. Unless you're going to write these pages, leave the red links off please. Also, the lead needs to say what the sting was for. Harro5 08:32, Jun 1, 2005 (UTC)
- No, that is wrong. If there is a topic that should be written, and you've correctly named it according to the Wikipedia:Naming conventions, it is very important to have these red links, because they tell us where articles should be. They are often very helpful in expanding Wikipedia. Of course it must be taken into account whether the topic deserves its own article or whether it should be redirected and covered in another topic, or not at all. - Taxman ^Talk 14:01, Jun 1, 2005 (UTC)
Specific comments for the article, please do research with the most reliable sources available, inlcuding public court filings if possible, and cite the sources preferably with inline citations. - Taxman ^Talk 14:01, Jun 1, 2005 (UTC)