Talk:New Age Ancient Near East Chronology
It seems this page is more about alternative ideas about sea-people than anything to do with New Age Ancient Near East Chronologies. I don't know if Velikovsky (it was not Rohl's idea), nor Rohl for that matter, can really be classified as New-Age or rather simply non-conventional or at worst anti-establishment. How about filling this page out a bit with some more really zany ideas which are in existence out there concerning middle-eastern chronologies for example the Alien origin theories.
from VfD
- New Age Ancient Near East Chronology -- The body of the article is unrelated to the title and the rest is demeaning in Kenneth Kitchen-ite style thus neither is is NPOV. Any useful relevant info can be moved to relevant pagest such as Sea Peoples and Phoenicians while the rest is already said in a much more objective & detailed manner on the David Rohl page. Zestauferov 08:29, 27 Dec 2003 (UTC)
- It at least needs some serious NPOV work. I'm not familiar enough with the content to be able to tell if it's total bunk. moink 20:33, 3 Jan 2004 (UTC)
- I've redirected it for now and listed it on Wikipedia:Cleanup so if anyone wants to NPOV it and sort it out they unredirect it and deal with it. Angela. 05:57, Jan 4, 2004 (UTC)
Start a discussion about improving the New Age Ancient Near East Chronology page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "New Age Ancient Near East Chronology" page.
