Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swanny

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was REDIRECT. jni 10:52, 7 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Swanny

This article appears to be a dicdef of a neologism. (The word apparently does exist with a different definition, but wouldn't ever be more than a dicdef.) ~~Delete~~. --TenOfAllTrades (talk/contrib) 01:17, 1 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

- Okay, Grutness' redirect (listed below) seems reasonable. --TenOfAllTrades (talk/contrib) 15:19, 2 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
SPEEDIED as Patent nonsense. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 06:55, 1 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Neologism or hoax. Quale 01:35, 1 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, neologism. Megan1967 04:41, 1 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oops. By coincidence, recreated today by me as a redirect to Swanndri. All New Zealanders know what a Swanny is. Grutness|^hello? 06:11, 2 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the redirect (of course) :-) -- BDAbramson ^thimk 06:12, 2005 May 5 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.