User talk:Wikimol

Tea pics arrangement

Hi Wikimol - very strange! Totally different to how they appear for me. Here's what I've got. Let me know how you think is best to proceed (I'll also delete these two pics when they're done with, as there's no point in cluttering up the wiki servers with them forever). - MPF 21:10, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I have a question

Hi! I`m sorry, to interrupt you, but I can`t find your E-mail, so, I`m writinig here. Can I have answer on such question:" Is it yours picture about Lorence attractor? if it is so, can you tell me, with what program you have modeled it? Plzzz, answer on my E-mail: Roman123@inbox.ru " Thank you, and sorry!

Hedvicek

IMHO it is better to leave it as it is. RH obviously enjoys the wars. You may invoke WP:RFC but this is slow and, frannkly, few people here will be interested. Other option would be high level decision made on Czech Wiki and pushed via high level here (I think it would be precedent but quite useful one). Pavel Vozenilek 22:03, 2 March 2006 (UTC)Al[reply]

The only Hedvicek contributions I meant to endorse were in the article itself. The personal attacks he's been leveling on the talk page are unacceptable. Again I believe if, after this RfC cools down, you list Ross Hedvicek for deletion, the nomination is likely to go through.

Also, I wanted to make sure you know that your translations were not what I was attacking. A previous version I looked at contained some more overtly malicious link description. As far as I can see, your translations are accurate. --djrobgordon 14:56, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

see 01:06, 5 March 2006 (hist) (diff) User talk:Jimbo Wales (Just FYI - not hoping for too much.) here: [1]

see here :-)

Historicka fakta ve Werichovi

Zapomen na to ze mne nenavidis a nastuduji si historicka fakta, kdyz uz jsi je osobne nezazil, 2000 slov se podepisovalo na jare 1968, ne v roce 1972. Werich je narodni figura - v jeho hesle by nemely byt blbosti - i kdyz je opravuju ja. Ross.Hedvicek 18:46, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kaçkar Dağı

Hi! I saw your image of Kaçkar Dağı Peak in Turkey. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kackar_Dagi Do you have other information for this Peak or Mountain? Thanks! devact@gmail.com

Off-wiki personal attacks poll

Since you have previously participated in discussions about the off-wiki NPA policy, I wanted to let you know about a quick opinion poll that is now posted on the Talk page there. Your input is appreciated!

Wikipedia_talk:No_personal_attacks#Poll:_Off-wiki_Personal_Attacks

Thank you

For providing interesting sources regarding the bias in German historical publications regarding population transfer of Germans from Soviet occupied territories. I must confess that I find the view that Czechs aren't neutral because they are Czechs slightly disturbing, I could likewise argue that Italians aren't neutral since they were part of Axis in WW2. I believe that unless evidence is presented regarding flaws in historical research we shouldn't claim somebody isn't neutral because he is of certain nationality. Have a good day. --Molobo 00:59, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you have a time try to look at Stork's discussion page

He has started to call for ignoring of Czech scholars claiming that Czechs(the nation ?!) are perpetrators of ethnic cleansing and do their historic research based on financial grounds. Care to comment ? --Molobo 18:17, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Molobo strikes again. The discussion is based on my preference for neutral sources that have no tie to the highly inflamed issue. If you look at my edits in the expulsions page you will se that I have also used sources from Czechoslovakia. But as usual Molobo seems to thrive on creating conflict. --Stor stark7 18:25, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

@Molobo, Stor stark7 - I'm sory but I don't have time to engage in that disscussion again --Wikimol 09:53, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Expulsion of Germans after World War II

Seeing the fight there: this page is absolutely fucked up and without hope to get better. I guess it is price for WP's popularity. It is also better if the trolls get concentrated there and do not destroy the rest.

If I can offer advice - let it be. Sisyfos' work was more fulfilling that dealing with this page. Pavel Vozenilek 00:32, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

the page [is] actually improving sounds unbelievable. I watched it for couple of years and took it as a firm proof that WP can't work for controversial topics and now my faith got shattered :o Pavel Vozenilek 11:50, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kackar space photo

Hi, I saw your request for a photo of Kackar at Wikipedia:Requested_pictures. I searched for it at [2], this one [3] seemed to be the best one. --InfoCan 19:49, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pic on hungarian wiki

About hu:image:Vertreibung.jpg: hu:User:Dr. Steller refer from copyright, and she had got the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/1.0/deed.en right. So by my opinion you can use in Commons, if you attach the original comments about Authority&Proprietorship : Sudetendeutsche Stiftung --hu:Rodrigo 21:57, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Table

Hi. I think we should objective resources, and avoid nationalistic organisations. I suggest we remove the table from the Center of BDV. The site is full of inaccurate data and nationalistic undertones, which speaks poorly about its credibility. --Molobo 12:32, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

IMO - the table has reasonable structure and in some form should stay. What shall be done is to find numbers from more reasonable sources than ZGV website, and inlude such numbers. Also if there undertones in the descriptions, that should be corrected. --Wikimol 21:59, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Commons Quality images proposal

Thankyou for your suggestions in the proposed quality image pages, I have included them into the criteria, with some minor copy editing. I would appreciate if you could revisit, if there anything you think needs to be changed/clarified please just edit. Thanks Gnangarra 13:48, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Dwire.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dwire.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 04:41, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Evil Ol' English Grammar

I noticed that you mentioned that you had trouble with English grammar. The next time you do a piece or an edit in English, let me know, and I will grammar edit it for you. I willonly charge you a beer wheni come to Prague. Because thatis where beer lost its virginity. :)Arcayne 05:55, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Zacheus

For the moment, I'm interested in whether he is writing things in his user space in Czech that he would not be allowed to write in English, such as attacking other users. If he is not, then I doubt he will object to you telling me so. If his user page is an attack page, I don't care who tells me so, although I understand your reluctance to get involved. Thatcher131 23:51, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: cs: translation for Mayflower

Hey Wikimol, thank you very much for your translation of Mayflower!! I've uploaded it to the toolserver, and it should be available at http://tools.wikimedia.de/~tangotango/mayflower/?il=cs . I've noticed that "Řadit podle data nahrání" and "Řadit podle relevance" are a bit too long to fit in the search box on search.php (The main search results page). Would it be possible to slightly shorten either both or one of these strings so that they fit in the search box? If it's not possible, I'll widen the box, but it would be nice if you could find an abbreviated alternative :-) Thanks a lot, Tangotango (talk) 17:40, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for updating the strings! If there's anything else that seems strange, please let me know. Cheers, Tangotango (talk) 02:42, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reference essay

Hi Wikimol, please feel free to translate my reference essay. Sorry for the late reply, I was traveling. Cheers, AxelBoldt 12:41, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mountain WIlderness

I have written a more thorough version of the Mountain WIlderness article for which you wrote a stub Many thanks for your work on this topic! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Steyncham (talk • contribs) 18:16, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of green tea

I like the nice touch you gave the picture on green tea. As I'm into mathematics and also into thee, so they are a good fit! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.197.161.160 (talk) 15:44, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I second that comment! It's nice to see physics snuck in wherever it can be! What are you calculating? I can just see a wave vector and what looks like a differential of a cos theta... 213.100.47.249 (talk) 08:15, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

-) Thanks. These are lecture notes borrowed from a friend and if I recall it was some simple quantum mechanical problem. --Wikimol (talk) 07:00, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Namesti-republiky.jpeg

File:Namesti-republiky.jpeg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Metro Prague station.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Metro Prague station.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:29, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

tea's cognitive perfomance enhancment

is the cognitive performance of tea really true because the picture you show seems to present a strong bond between enhanced cognitive performance with tea drinking in particular un oxdized green tea (as the picture shows) now in your physics degree does green tea (pure unoxdized and oxidized) ehance you performance (i.e grades improved as well as a better understanding of topics than pupils that do not drink tea or drink coffee) thanks for your opinion —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.132.63.33 (talk) 09:52, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Universe People

I have nominated Universe People, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Universe People. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ash (talk) 00:06, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Asthar Sheran and Ester with a spaceship-FairUse claimedfor Universe People article.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Asthar Sheran and Ester with a spaceship-FairUse claimedfor Universe People article.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Ash (talk) 10:14, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Wikimol! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 2 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Roger Balian - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 11:25, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:SundialOnEastFacingWall-Prague-wikipedia.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:SundialOnEastFacingWall-Prague-wikipedia.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:09, 18 February 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:09, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:SundialOnEastFacingWall-Prague-wikipedia.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:SundialOnEastFacingWall-Prague-wikipedia.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:59, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can this annoyances end, please? It is already clear from File:SundialOnEastFacingWall-Prague-wikipedia.jpg who the author is, when it was uploaded, etc. In the sense of the license and copyright law everything is ok. If there is now some brain-damaged rule insisiting normal means of authorship declaration in History is insufficient and the same info has to be filled by hand in some form, please do it yourself. Thanks. --Wikimol (talk) 12:13, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Asthar Sheran and Ester with a spaceship.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Asthar Sheran and Ester with a spaceship.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fæ (talk) 14:46, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:NOT

Template:NOT has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:30, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Picture Hochfernerspitze [4]

Hello Wikimol, on behalf of Charly Wehrle, former host of the "Reintalangerhütte", Wetterstein, I am asking you if you could give him the permission to publish the photografy, which is shown at the Wikipedia-Site about the Hochfernerspitze. Charly Wehrle wrote 6 stories about different climbing-tours concerning this area. Could you please send him your decision on information@charly-wehrle.de Thank you very much. Selbsteiner (nice photo, by the way!) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Selbsteiner (talk • contribs) 20:43, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Username

Hi, Wikimol, just coming across, I noticed your username. DYK "mol" in Dutch also means "mole"? Lotje (talk) 06:16, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just for your interest

German television news use one of your images.

http://wetter.tagesschau.de/wetterthema/2016/11/23/der-schmetterlingseffekt.html

Kindest regards, --Drahreg01 (talk) 21:06, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]