Talk:Phoenician chronology

Is this original work? -- Zoe

This should be deleted.

1) It's redundant. We already have articles on Phoenicia, the Phoenicians, and Carthage. 2) It's inaccurate (radiocarbon dates put the founding of Carthage in the last quarther of the ninth century BCE). 3) It relies on pre-modern sources, which themselves rely almost completely upon tradition, not evidence. 4) It's original research.--Rob117 19:55, 20 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

What the heck does On-line Library of www.google.com as well mean at the end of the second paragraph?? Not a prank, it was entered together with the rest of the paragraph many diffs ago.

If you want to put it through the AfD process, feel free. Deskana (talk) 16:18, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup (25 January 2006)

I added the tag with the following things in mind:

Attempting to add the title of the article into the first sentence in an appropriate manner
Adding links to other relevant articles in Wikipedia
~~Removing HTML and exchaning for Wiki-syntax where possible~~ -- Done. Deskana (talk) 16:21, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Adding reliable and verifiable sources and reference
Adding external links
Adding more categories (if possible)
Tabulating information at the bottom of the page
Splitting article into releveant subheadings/sections

I will attempt some of this myself, but with no knowledge in the field of the article I can only do so much. Deskana (talk) 16:18, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]