Talk:Three-component theory of stratification

Sociology Mid‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Anthropology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Socialism Low‑importance

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Three-component theory of stratification be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

IMO this division is pretty arbitrary and depends on the particular historical period. Why "economical relationship" is the touchstone? Why not religion? Say, what's wrong with the following two-component stratification?

religious class.
status class, based on other criteria, other than religion.

IMO it will work pretty well in ancient Egypt.

And party class is so naive a notion. Why not sports fan class? Mikkalai 09:21, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Cleanup tag

I have tagged this article for cleanup because it needs to be rewritten primarily using our own words, rather than relying so heavily on direct quotes. —An gr ^{If you've written a quality article...} 19:14, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Examples listed for forms of wealth

These are all tangible assets, it is intangible property that most differentiates those who are rich/wealthy and those who are not (stocks/bonds, dividends, private pensions, funds that incentivise long term deposit of the means of exchange,) especially when considering the privileged tax status that this form of property holds (i.e. they attract little.) Thus this should be changed.

81.147.40.55 (talk) 22:42, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple policy violations, essay not encyclopedia article

This is an original research essay, not an encyclopedia article.

It violates multiple wiki policies.

The t lede 1st sentence does not define the subject.

The lede 1st paragraph does not summarize the body.

Nothing is sourced properly.

Almost no sentence is supported by sources. MBUSHIstory (talk) 08:40, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]