User talk:Argav
Strange edit results?
[edit]It looks like something messed up your edit? What was this edit meant to do? —AySz88\^-^ 01:18, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- Some kind of database error and I didn't have time to go back and fix it. All is well with the current version of the page, so thanks! --Argav ۞ 23:16, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Revelation-first-poster.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Revelation-first-poster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:38, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Revelation-second-poster.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Revelation-second-poster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:39, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
TfD nomination of Template:Signature4862
[edit]Template:Signature4862 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — 209.244.43.122 (talk) 19:41, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Blanking
[edit]I did not say it was the same individual. And I gave more than a two-word explanation. Cirt (talk) 22:05, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]
- Hi! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
- -- 19:54, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
💁 listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 💁. Since you had some involvement with the 💁 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 05:29, 10 September 2017 (UTC)