Talk:Alhamdulillah

It is requested that one or more audio files be included in this article to improve its quality.
Please see Wikipedia:Requested recordings for more on this request.

Shouldn't this be moved to Wiktionary? Or even deleted? Jwrosenzweig 22:58, 19 Aug 2003 (UTC)

We have many options but, if Alhumdulilah were to stay on Wikipedia, it would need to be moved to Alhamdulillah (the correct spelling). It should be on Wiktionary, yes. Also, we cannot just delete any short stubs. We must hope more people take interest in developing Wiki's stub articles (see Wikipedia:Find or fix a stub), a very rewarding but also difficult and boring task for contributors. Take care. Usedbook 11:30, 6 Sep 2003 (UTC)

Thanks This Helped Me Alot!

I think it's fine here, since alhamdulillah is more than just an expression. Basawala 01:25, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ERROR: This page states the following definitions: Ar-Rahman (The Merciful) Ar-Raheem (The Beneficent)

This is an error and the definitions for these two are mixed up. The correct definitions are the opposite: Ar-Rahman (The Beneficent) Ar-Raheem (The Merciful)

Please correct this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.16.135.193 (talk) 17:33, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is my understanding that the 'People of the Book' generally refers to only Muslims, Christians and Jews, and not Zoroastrians as THIS article claims. Shouldn't it be corrected? Made of nguyen (talk) 05:23, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to those who Know. Whoever started this page Must needs study more and take their emotions out of their writings — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.78.200.239 (talk) 03:53, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

How to call that link

Am I the only one that thinks "Health benefits of saying Alhamdulillah" is a terrible name for a link on Wikipedia? Yes, the article it leads to has this as a headline - but it seems so unscientific to me (making it sound as if it were scientifically true, instead of a religious belief). Is there a way to add a disclaimer or something? --Rautermann (talk) 00:57, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Alhamdulillah. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040630100112/http://www.islamonline.net:80/english/Science/2000/2/article3.shtml to http://www.islamonline.net/English/Science/2000/2/article3.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:19, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Definite article

It would improve the entry a great deal to add the grammatical reason for the appearance of the definite article. --Backinstadiums (talk) 16:52, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Colloquial use

In a recent essay, Haroon Moghul mentions a colloquial usage of Alhamdulillah, which he implies is universal in Muslim countries. The precise quotation is, "I did the Muslim equivalent of throwing my hands in the air. "Alhamdulillah," I said — Arabic for, Praise the Lord." (Whole essay here: http://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2017/09/26/553712758/an-encounter-at-a-passport-checkpoint-offers-respite-from-depressions-grip.) If accurate, this context should be added to the article. I won't do it myself, because I don't speak Arabic and some who know more about this might not agree that this is as common as Haroon suggests. Laodah 23:59, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, colloquially alhamdulillah can be used as an answer to "How are you?" or "How's the family?", meaning little more than "Fine, thanks." Maybe someone can cite a beginners' Arabic textook as a source. (My Arabic class used the teacher's own matzerials.) Wegesrand (talk) 10:39, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Aslamu alikum

im asaiment wok 37.111.166.187 (talk) 18:18, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

aslamu alikum 37.111.166.187 (talk) 18:19, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]