User talk:148.87.1.171

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your IP address, 148.87.1.171, is registered to Oracle Datenbanksysteme GmbH and may be shared by multiple users, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Network administrators or other parties wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

February 2004

Anonymous user, you are misreading the page history. On all the occasions you've posted something to the page, someone else has reverted your change. I don't know why they are doing so. I have been reverting other vandalism of this page (goodness knows why it's seeing so much attention today), but I have reverted none of your edits from this IP address. Btw, I suggest you get a user account (they're totally free) because it makes it easier for me to see what your contributions have been. Thanks! Jwrosenzweig 22:58, 12 Feb 2004 (UTC)

March 2004

I just want to give you kudos for a good article: "Riva 128".

—Vespristiano 03:55, 2004 Mar 31 (UTC)

August 2004

Hi. Is there any more content you can add to DLW? Just stating the acronym is not enough for an article. It is tagged for speedy deletion - Tεx τ urε 17:24, 25 Aug 2004 (UTC)

January 2005

Regarding your edit of 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake. Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. - BanyanTree 23:33, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)

July 2005

I think this user deserves already a ban.... -Mariano 12:43, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

September 2005

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. -Loren 04:04, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

March 2006

Thanks for experimenting with the page Bassoon on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. —Wayward ^Talk 14:02, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

April 2006

Your recent edit to Rashtreeya Vidyalaya College of Engineering was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. For frequently asked questions about the bot please click here // Tawkerbot2 10:55, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

May 2006

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Natalie Maines. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Anger22 16:15, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

June 2006

Thank you for experimenting with the page Lubricated Goat on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. WinHunter ^(talk) 14:40, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

August 2006

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Home Alone 3. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Wisd e n17 15:36, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

September 2006

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages or sections with blank content. It is considered vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. MER-C 12:23, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding External Links added to Microsoft Powerpoint: Please do not add commercial links or links to your own private websites to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Stevepaget 20:22, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

November 2006

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Monica Bellucci, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. --Yamla 20:29, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

December 2006

With regards to your comments on Talk:Wikipedia: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. John254 04:13, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to User talk:Anirudh hungund, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. John254 04:39, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently vandalized a Wikipedia article, and you are now being asked to stop this type of behavior. You're welcome to continue editing Wikipedia, so long as these edits are constructive. Please see Wikipedia's Blocking policy and what constitutes vandalism; such actions are not tolerated on Wikipedia, and are not taken lightly.

We hope that you will become a legitimate editor. Again, you are welcome here at Wikipedia, but remember not to vandalize or you will soon be blocked from editing.

If you feel you have received this message in error, it may be because you are using a shared IP address. Nevertheless, repeated vandalism from this address may cause you to be included in any future sanctions such as temporary blocks or bans. To avoid confusion in the future, we invite you to create a user account of your own. SkierRMH 01:01, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Big Bang, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dar-Ape 01:13, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for vandalizing Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. --Nlu (talk) 12:44, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Best Buy's no-Christmas policy

I won't revert you again...although I'm assuming another editor will when they notice the changes, but no, not "All objections to inclusion of no-Christmas policy were rebutted." The last comment on the relevant talk page section asks why it's notable enough to be included. That still needs to be addressed. Several editors have expressed their feelings on the matter, and a single IP has argued against them. A few weeks of silence does not equal consensus to add the material back in. --Onorem 17:06, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No consensus was reached on this matter, and I highly suspect that you are well aware of this. All that a person has to do is review your edit history on Wikipedia. This sort of behavior isn't unusual for you. You're not a stranger to vandalism.

Now, I'm not going to argue this issue with you anymore because I have said what I have to say. As have many other editors. If you want to continue to discuss the matter on the talk page, then by all means I'm in favor of that. But don't just continue to make edits to a page because you think it should be done. I suggest you leave the page alone. This is your first warning. B2bomber81 01:35, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Best Buy

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Some of your recent edits, such as those you made to Best Buy, have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please also see the talk page for further discussion on this matter before making any further edits to Best Buy B2bomber81 01:39, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. Paul Cyr 04:01, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove my comments from Talk:Best Buy it is vandalism and you will be blocked if you continue. Paul Cyr 21:01, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Larry Ellison

I find it very ironic that you're editing Larry Ellison's article. That is indeed a notable house--largest authentic Japanese structure outside of Japan--and it is a $40 million one. Regards, Tuxide 02:19, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ~ Arjun 21:14, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To edit, please log in.

Due to persistent vandalism originating from your proxy server or network, editing by anonymous users from your shared IP address or address range is currently disabled. Registered users, however, are still able to edit. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, please see here. We apologize for any inconvenience caused.

~ Arjun 21:16, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

March 2007

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Vitamin K, you will be blocked from editing. - Denny 13:24, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, please ignore this warning

Your recent edit to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Power hour (drinking game) (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 17:49, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Simran Bagga

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Simran Bagga page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. xC | ☎ 17:07, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits made during August 10 2007 (UTC) to Shuffleboard

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. Eric Wester 01:28, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

September 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Hercules, you will be blocked from editing. Brianga 03:28, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Hercules. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. \/\/AYCOOL²⁷_talk 03:29, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

May 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The Clique Summer Collection, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: The Clique Summer Collection was changed by 148.87.1.171 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2008-05-07T23:55:35+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 23:55, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Hualañé has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Ndenison ^talk 18:45, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Rajkumar has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\bblogspot\.com' (link(s): http://kannadafilmstars.blogspot.com/) . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 08:11, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

May 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. One or more of the external links you added in this edit to the page Arduino do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. You may wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Cst17 (talk) 12:15, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Norbert Meier has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \byoutube\.com (links: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6-8zdvnvfy). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. Video links are also strongly deprecated by our guidelines for external links, partly because they're useless to people with slow internet connections.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 22:04, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Nomination of Steltor for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Steltor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steltor until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 19:19, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Zhinanzen listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Zhinanzen. Since you had some involvement with the Zhinanzen redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 09:54, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of English Shepherd for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article English Shepherd is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/English Shepherd until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cavalryman (talk) 22:36, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.