Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emptv.com
The result of the debate was delete [added by Andre🚐 22:41, 15 August 2022 (UTC) for afdstats]
It's so rare that an article itself so clearly tells you that its subject is absolutely nonnotable. "Zach claims that his website's sole pupose is an outlet of his web design/programming skills. He vows not to update regularly or frequently; his content usually pertains to nothing other than happings on the site." Need I say more? Delete. Postdlf 04:43, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Albinoblacksheep may be notable, but there's no evidence that this minor schism off of it is. -- Antaeus Feldspar 04:55, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Vanity. Wikipedia is not a web directory. jni 11:41, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete: Site vanity. Geogre 13:06, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete, vanity Sietse 14:29, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Vanity of vanities, saith the Preacher. --Neschek 16:09, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Obvious and self-admitted vanity. Nadavspi 18:43, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Vanity. --Improv 20:54, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete, non-notable. --Zantolak 06:01, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. This should be a speedy! Andre (talk) 14:10, Oct 19, 2004 (UTC)