Talk:Fumarole

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fumarole article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Volcanoes High‑importance

	Volcanoes portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Geology Mid‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:Fumarole is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has been mentioned by a media organization:

Nicholson Baker (Thursday 10 April 2008). "How I fell in love with Wikipedia [1]". The Guardian. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)

Hazards

how can fumaroles be hazardous? (18:25, 11 May 2005 24.176.140.88)

See their description, particularly what they emit. Consider possible hazards. I'm not giving a direct response right now to avoid doing someone's homework for them. (SEWilco 03:48, 12 May 2005 (UTC))[reply]

The previous is a catty response. Especially for an article "Fumaroles" that is so badly written. Wikipedia, like all dictionaries/encyclopedias, is a starting point for reading; the entry should suggest a direction for thought and further reading. Let's not think of Wikipedia as just a crib for the high school term paper.

Simply put to answer the question: those gases are poisonous and the heat would scald to death.StevenTorrey (talk) 16:48, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mammoth Mountain

Question: Regarding the fumarole written here as opening up in 2009, does this refer to the fumarole that has existed near Chair 3 since before people were around? (The fumarole the ski patrollers had an accident with in 2006) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.248.3.2 (talk) 22:41, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Biota in fumaroles

No mention of Thermophiles in this article ? Anyone know whether there are any specific to fumaroles or are they all similar/identical across all types of hydrothermal vent? EdwardLane (talk) 23:47, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The oceanic Fumarole may very well have been the source of energy and life on planet earth those billions of years ago. This article needs to be seriously revised to discuss in greater detail the Oceanic Fumarole as a source of life on Planet Earth. There also ought to be a link to Hydrothermal Vent which is a more thorough article discussing "Biota in Fumaroles".StevenTorrey (talk) 16:48, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Steam vent

Is this the same thing, synonymous, with a steam vent? Candleabracadabra (talk) 05:18, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Solfatara" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Solfatara. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 6#Solfatara until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. MB 23:05, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fumarola

On 3 June 2023, User:31.217.18.212 changed the first few words of this article from "A fumarole (or fumerole) is a vent ..." to "A fumarole is a vent ..." at 16:43 with an edit summary of "fixed misspelling", then at 16:44 to "A fumarole (or fumarola) is a vent ..." with edit summary of "fumarole is plural in italian". At 20:18, I reverted this user's edits. My edit summary was "reverted edit by 31.217.18.212 - "fumerole" is an alternative English spelling - this is English Wikipedia". Then at 21:33, user 31.217.18.212 changed the text to "A fumarole (also fumarola or fumerole) is a vent ..." with no edit summary.

I have found no evidence (e.g. a reliable source reference) for the unsourced claim that "fumarola" is a valid English word that has the same meaning as "fumarole" or "fumerole".

The following English dictionaries do NOT include "fumarola":

Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary ( https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fumarola )

Dictionary.com ( https://www.dictionary.com/misspelling?term=fumarola )

Collins English Dictionary ( https://www.collinsdictionary.com/spellcheck/english?q=fumarola )

Chambers 21st Century Dictionary ( https://chambers.co.uk/search/?query=fumarola&title=21st ).

The onus is on the editor who adds text to a Wikipedia article to provide a reliable source. See WP:PROVEIT.

On 4 June at 17:43, I removed the unsourced claim that "fumarola" is an alternative English spelling or synonym of "fumarole" and I added a source reference citation for "fumerole" being a valid English alternative for "fumarole", with an edit summary of "removed unsourced dubious claim that "fumarola" is a valid English alternative spelling or synonym of "fumarole". To avoid an edit war please discuss at Talk:Fumarole#Fumarola instead of restoring "fumarola"", in an attempt to avoid edit warring.

— GeoWriter (talk) 18:13, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]