Talk:PiHKAL

Chemistry Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Psychoactive and Recreational Drugs (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational Drugs, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsWikipedia:WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsTemplate:WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsPsychoactive and Recreational Drugs articles

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Alternative Views Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative ViewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative ViewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative ViewsAlternative Views articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge with Shulgin Rating Scale

I am fully against this because they are clearly separate entities in their own right. It is of no relevance that the scale was mentioned in PiHKAL. Turkeyphan^t 14:52, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My Opinion I think that a easy-to-find link to the Rating Scale in every Shulgin's related page is enough for understanding how the effects are described by Alexander. Eric Castagna, --190.48.204.222 21:47, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Title

The correct title of these books are PIHKAL and TIHKAL, with the "I" capitalized. Can we move the articles? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.54.201.38 (talk) 17:31, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

PEA

This section needs some work, I think. Aside from the fact that none of it is cited, much of it comes across as POV ("supplement of the gods"). It also contains inappropriate speculation (e.g. hypothesizing why Shulgin considers PEA to be without effect). Finally, what exactly PEA is is never mentioned. I don't possess the requisite knowledge to bring this section up to snuff; hopefully someone who does will be able to give it the improvements it needs. El Whizzo (talk) 09:06, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Links in compound table

If somebody has a lot of time / nifty tools, the links to chemical pages may be added in the table (the pages can be found in the navbox). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 163.158.90.245 (talk) 20:15, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]