Talk:John Cody

Sacking

Why is there no reference to the story of how Pope Paul VI could not decide whether or not to remove Cardinal Cody from office over allegations of financial and sexual impropriety? [unsigned, undated; according to the history this was posted 2005.04.08]

Why indeed? These elements are mentioned in the Paul VI entry, but not here in the entry of the man they pertain to. -Jm546 22:04, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

Because a reference to it wasn't contained in the sources used to create the article. As I myself don't know the details and references for it first hand, I would have qualms about adding it myself. If you do have references and details, though, feel free to add them. John Carter 16:12, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Ok. Andrew123 (talk) 20:57, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Cardinal Bernardin

Why do we go into detail about Cardinal Bernardin at the end of the article? The paragraph even mentions the allegations of sexual misconduct against Bernardin. This is an article about Cardinal Cody.

I'm going to edit that article to say that Cardinal Cody was succeeded by Cardinal Bernardin and let readers read about Cardinal Bernardin in the Joseph Cardinal Bernardin article.

If you disagree, please post here, but I think this is in line with typical biographies.

Craig.borchardt 7 April 2007

Improprieties

I made a pass at including discussion and reference of improprieties, but much more could be reported about this Cardinal.

Estéban (talk) 20:33, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Footnote removal

I would like to remove footnote 11. It is a quote from a self-published source, and therefore fails to meet the guidelines for reliable sources. Revanneosl (talk) 20:37, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

• Hearing no objection, I'm going to delete the footnote. I've never deleted a footnote from Wikipedia before. Pray for me.Revanneosl (talk) 18:21, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Photo

Having his photo come from a site called "Ex-Catholics for Christ" seems rather biased. I'm sure something else could be found. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.11.74.233 (talk) 03:17, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on John Cody. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20151217223431/http://ncronline3.org/drupal/?q=node/3144 to http://ncronline3.org/drupal/?q=node/3144

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:49, 28 February 2016 (UTC)