Jump to content

User talk:UtherSRG

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Email this user
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Utherbot)


zOMG

[edit]
zOMG
I, Hojimachong, hereby award UtherSRG A completely gratuitous zOMG barnstar, for being 110% awesome. Plus 1. --Hojimachongtalk

WikiProject Mammals Notice Board

[edit]

Happy holidays!

[edit]

Padshah UtherSRG 2024

[edit]

You wrote "Since you can't explain in your own words, I see no reason to unblock you"

What own words? What do mean?

  • What questions should I answer You just decline the unblock request.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Homo sapiens History (talkcontribs)

Review of Scott Foster (Engineer)

[edit]

Hello kind person, thank you for fixing a few things on a draft I am working on. I have just submitted. Would you mind reviewing (and hopefully approving?) feedback welcome.

Draft:Scott Foster (engineer)

I am a PhD student in China - and this person came up in my research of energy efficient buildings and felt this person was deserving.

Kind regards,

W

Qetuadgjzcbm (talk) 11:17, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you aware that the Talk:Uchunari coffee page that you recently deleted survived a deletion discussion, see Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Uchunari coffee, making it exempt from G8? IIRC, it was actually tagged with {{g8-exempt}} to boot. Unless there's something I'm missing, the page should be immediately undeleted. 78.28.44.127 (talk) 08:02, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I don't think I'd seen the exemption before, so wasn't looking for it. And this wasn't so recently done... it was January 2023. I have restored the talk page now. - UtherSRG (talk) 11:17, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Dipierstechnologies (20:22, 26 September 2024)

[edit]

How do I delete defamatory Articles? --Dipierstechnologies (talk) 20:22, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Dipierstechnologies: You don't. Which article do you think is defamatory? - UtherSRG (talk) 21:42, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AFC rejection

[edit]

"Each reference should have only a single citation" is not in the policy page referenced (REFB). The WikiProject Article Creation guideline clearly warns reviewers to Avoid declining an article because you personally don't like the citation style or formatting (here). Please reverse your rejection. Ivan (talk) 17:03, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Иованъ: I know you know how to do what I'm asking. Also, learn the difference between a declined submission (where you are allowed to continue to work it to make it fit the main article space) and submission rejection (where you are required to halt work entirely and should move on to something else). - UtherSRG (talk) 17:10, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the clarification regarding the process. I know you know how to do what I'm asking is not very helpful. I genuinely don't. Can you please elaborate? Or perhaps demonstrate on one of the drafts what you had in mind? You never replied to any of my "Is this what you had in mind" attempts to conform these articles to your standards. Please bear in mind that these are my first ever hybrid articles. Ivan (talk) 17:14, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Иованъ: Look at other species articles in the same genus. There are literally thousands of examples for you to follow. - UtherSRG (talk) 17:15, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I mean with regards to the citations. Almost every editor has differences in citation style. Mine happen to provide quotations, which there is no rule against. But I don't even know if the quotations are what you object to. So please elaborate. Ivan (talk) 17:16, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Each reference should be to a single citation. Yours have multiple citations in some refs. And some of those citations are duplicated in other (often multi-)refs. Clean these up. Go look at other articles. Stop asking me questions that you can quickly research the answers yourself. - UtherSRG (talk) 17:18, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]