User talk:Dodger~enwiki

Hi! I've gotten the impression that you're interested in articles related to comics and sequential art. I've just created a project called WikiProject on Comics in order to establish consensus on the organization and content of such articles, and I hope you'll join in. See the main project page and please leave comments on the Talk page. Thanks! -leigh (φθόγγος) 06:54, Dec 6, 2004 (UTC)

Image:1950CanadianFordPrefect.jpg

Hi! Thanks for uploading Image:1950CanadianFordPrefect.jpg. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use {{gfdl}} if you release it under the GFDL, or {{fairuse}} if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Thanks so much, – Quadell ^{(talk) (help)}[[]] 02:29, Dec 20, 2004 (UTC)

Thanks! – Quadell ^{(talk) (help)}[[]] 12:43, Dec 20, 2004 (UTC)

Fair use disputed for Image:OrigIChatLogo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:OrigIChatLogo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:33, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:OrigIChatLogo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:OrigIChatLogo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:31, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Please restore OrigIchatLogo.gif

Hi! I've restored the image (Image:OrigIChatLogo.gif), but it still needs a fair use rationale - see WP:FURG for help on how to write one. east.718 at 20:31, January 25, 2008

Possibly unfree File:Sonic Screwdrivers.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sonic Screwdrivers.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ---mattbuck (Talk) 20:55, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Say what?

Template:Say what? has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Lord Vetinari 13:38, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Do not edit a user page

If you have a problem with me, discuss it on the talk page. Serendi ^pod ous 09:25, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I would, but you delete anything anyone says that disagrees with you.

I deleted what you (I assume it was you) wrote because it was abusive, not because I disagreed with it. Serendi ^pod ous 09:29, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've taken this to WP:ANI Serendi ^pod ous 09:31, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You do that. I'm defending an anonymous user who raised a point on a discussion page. I welcome hem to look at this as closely as they can Dodger (talk) 09:34, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever, you still should not be posting this to Serendipodous's user page. Please stop. And I'm not surprised that "That's because it's the NINTH FUCKING PLANET. FTW No matter what wikipedia shitheads insist some conference of asshats " was deleted. That was a forum style post inappropriate anywhere on Wikipedia and I would have deleted it if I'd seen it. Dougweller (talk) 10:06, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As he has every right to do. But you do not have any right to touch a user page. -- 98.171.173.90 (talk) 13:37, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Dodger. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Dodger~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

23:31, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

12:13, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:14, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]