Talk:Shantou

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 October 2021 and 9 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Damonmand.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 09:10, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Untitled

Should the content be merged with Chaozhou? olivier 09:14, 31 Jul 2003 (UTC)

It's a different city than Chaozhou, so I've corrected some of the inaccuracies here. - Fuzheado

Good. But why does the Chaozhou article say: "also known as Shantou"? olivier 10:05, 31 Jul 2003 (UTC)

Good question. I fixed Chaozhou. They are different cities.

Shouldn't the link to Li Ka Shing be under the Chaozhou entry? olivier 01:57, 1 Aug 2003 (UTC)

I think both would be appropriate -- he's from Chaozhou originally, but has also given much cash to Shantou for their university. - Fuzheado 02:54, 1 Aug 2003 (UTC)

Who is Caiwen? Is he a famous a person at all? Is it a trick that he played in order to made himself famous? And what's his research? Extenics?What's that? I searched that keyword on google and ieeexplorer and other scientific databases globally known and it seems there's not a single match? I delete him because there're certainly more famous people in Shantou and Chenghai who is not recognized. Why should we recognize some one that seems so much in question?- Puekai 19:37, 18 Dec 2006 (UTC)

I suggest Shantou and Chaozhou to merge as they have same dialect and many similarity. it's would be unique and interest, besides most chinese call Chaoshan 朝汕 . - Lennlin

{{geodata-check}}

Please note that the coordinates in this article need fixing as:

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Shantou. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130921055035/http://old-cdc.cma.gov.cn/shuju/search1.jsp?dsid=SURF_CLI_CHN_MUL_MMON_19712000_CES&tpcat=SURF&type=table&pageid=3 to http://old-cdc.cma.gov.cn/shuju/search1.jsp?dsid=SURF_CLI_CHN_MUL_MMON_19712000_CES&tpcat=SURF&type=table&pageid=3
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070615023537/http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2002920133_ewaste09.html to http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2002920133_ewaste09.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150630223209/http://english.shantou.gov.cn/News.aspx?tid=3&nid=2309 to http://english.shantou.gov.cn/News.aspx?tid=3&nid=2309

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:07, 22 May 2017 (UTC)