Talk:Cantus firmus

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles

l'homme arme

It would be good to break out a separate l'homme arme article in due course.

References

I need to add references to the two suggested l'homme arme origins:- The St Michael the Archangel attribution is from 'The Pelican History of Music, vol2' ed Robertson & Stevens, Pelican 1963 The 'Cambrai pub' attribution is from Pryer's article on Dufay in 'the New Oxford Companion to Music' Oxford 1983

I think the standard reference on Cantus Firmus is still Sparks' 'Cantus Firmus in Mass & Motet' Berkeley 1963

Linuxlad 10:38, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)

I think we definitely have enough for a l'homme armé article. It will need a musical example, of course. Thanks for the Pryer reference--I had never heard this one, and it's a good story. I remember reading that the "armed man" probably referred to arming oneself for the ongoing fight with the Turks (remember, this was right around the time of the fall of Constantinople) --there's a pretty good article in Grove which I can look up when I get home from work. Also if I remember there are a total of 31 settings of the tune in masses between 1450 and 1650. Fun stuff. Antandrus 16:03, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Plural

— Is it correct that the plural of "cantus" should be "cantus" and not "canti" ? http://www.math.ohio-state.edu/~econrad/lang/ln2.html reports "cantus" as belonging to second declension with plural in -i. --Wentu 20:48, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wentu, I canot explain why that site gives cantus as second declension. But a Google search on {cantus declension} will show this to be a decidedly minority opinion. My reference works confirm cantus as fourth declension. Noetica 22:49, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pre-existing?

The article defines it as "pre-existing", but that is not really required. Composers also compose new cantus firmi from scratch. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1000:B075:2CCF:B0D0:FA65:6CF5:4187 (talk) 18:31, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wouldn't that still assume the cantus is written first, and only afterward used as the basis for a polyphonic composition? Well, logic aside, what is needed (as always on Wikipedia) is a reliable source verifying that there may be exceptions.—Jerome Kohl (talk) 22:53, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]