Talk:Verrazzano-Narrows Bridge

Verrazzano-Narrows Bridge has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 26, 2018	Good article nominee	Listed

Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on November 21, 2009, November 21, 2010, November 21, 2014, November 21, 2019, and November 21, 2022.

Bridges and Tunnels High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York City High‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives: 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by when more than 6 sections are present.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Gabriela Shen.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 12:19, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Opinions on transportation issues

Regarding the following statement in the article: While the high cost of the toll between Brooklyn and Staten Island has always been an issue for residents, some[who?] favor the toll because they see it as a way to curb population growth on Staten Island. Each of the four bridges to the Island is tolled.

Generally the entire spectrum of possible opinions are held by some residents about every transportation issue. Some people do want to see growth, others are against it. This comment could be made about every bridge that replaced a ferry, every airport runway, and every road. Somebody is for it, some are against it. I would suggest that it be removed as a meaningless statement unless it is supported by a poll or good news article.Pacomartin (talk)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Verrazzano Narrows Bridge.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:22, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Name of bridge locally

Locally the bridge is simply known as the Verrazzano and I think it should be added to the header. La Fuzion (K lo K) 20:19, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Verrazano-Narrows Bridge circa 1960.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:05, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is a discrepancy in the photo dates

In the "construction" section of this article there is a photo which is dated 1960 that shows one tower completed and the suspension cables already "strung" across the top toward the other tower which MUST be in place to "catch" the cables. However, there is another photo below it dated 1962, which shows the tower as not anywhere close to complete, and also no cables at all! What gives?? 47.7.240.106 (talk) 23:44, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Good catch! According to sources in the article, the first steel was not placed until late 1961 and cables were not strung until 1963. I removed the 1960 date from the caption since it must be wrong. Station1 (talk) 04:20, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]