User talk:LegitReality

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! -- Graham ☺ | Talk 03:34, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)

---

Hi, please see my question/comment at Talk:List of songs deemed inappropriate by Clear Channel following the September 11, 2001 attacks. Jgm 13:23, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Cupertino, California

Hi, welcome to Wikipedia. I reverted your edits to Cupertino, California because they weren't written in an encyclopedic style. If you'd like to discuss WHY the works were banned without making an attack on the individual involved, please feel free to do so. Rick K 09:30, Nov 25, 2004 (UTC)

PETA

Introducing inappropriate headers and unqualified content just makes work for others. If you have legitimate content to add perhaps bring it up on the Talk page. Marskell 05:17, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

ACLU

Hey -- great work starting on an ACLU list of cases. This is very important. Question: can you make this a category instead of a page? That will make it easy for people in the future. See [1] for info on how to do this. Then, whenever there is a new case, someone can just add the category tag and it automatically appears on the ACLU case category you've created. Sdedeo (tips) 00:58, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for making the category! This will be a great resource. Sdedeo (tips) 14:51, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Could we limit this category to cases that ACLU lawyers actually prosecuted, instead of any case in which they were merely "involved"? Signing on to an amicus brief should not be enough for inclusion in the category. Postdlf 18:32, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]