Talk:Oswald Mosley

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Oswald Mosley article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 365 days

Military history: Biography / British / European / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War I task force

Biography: Military / Peerage and Baronetage / Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Peerage and Baronetage (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as High-importance).

Politics Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics of the United Kingdom Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Mid‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives: 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Lede is misleading

Block evasion by User:HarveyCarter.

The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

The Battle of Cable Street increased anti-Semitism in the UK, caused the BUF to have a surge in its membership, and led to the BUF performing much better in elections. (2A00:23C5:C416:A601:9871:3D07:3A3B:93FF (talk) 16:36, 31 March 2024 (UTC))[reply]

No evidence for that. Emeraude (talk) 17:33, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There does seem to be some evidence of this, according to facinghistory.org: "By late October 1936, membership in the BUF had increased by 2,000, with many joining East End branches of the organisation. In March 1937, Tilles notes that the BUF received 18% of the East End vote, and around 30% of the non-Jewish vote, in the three main areas of the Cable Street confrontation between demonstrators, police, and Fascists." (2A00:23C5:C416:A601:5D5:2982:8A27:BCE4 (talk) 18:57, 31 March 2024 (UTC))[reply]

Birkett / 18B

The article currently has this:- "Mosley, who at that time was focused on pleading for the British to accept Hitler's peace offer of March, was detained on 23 May 1940, less than a fortnight after Winston Churchill became prime minister. Mosley was interrogated for 16 hours by Lord Birkett but never formally charged with a crime, and was instead interned under Defence Regulation 18B."

And this obviously is not true.

Mosley was detained, at his home, on 23 May, by Special Branch officers acting on an 18B order from Home Secretary and Minister of Home Defence Sir John Anderson (of "Anderson shelter" fame). There was no requirement for a criminal charge. 18B applied to Mosley as a member of an organisation (the BUF) "subject to foreign influence or control" -- intelligence had come to hand showing that Mosley had been bankrolled by Mussolini's Italy, which was allied to Nazi Germany and would shortly declare war on the United Kingdom -- and because Mosley "had associations with persons concerned in the government of, or sympathies with the system of government of, any Power with which His Majesty is at war", namely his associations with one Adolf Hitler, who was guest of honour at the Mosleys' wedding in Goebbels' drawing room. Mosley's arrest was extremely popular at the time, and even The Times, which had been a pro-appeasement paper, published a letter next day reading, "Sir -- I note with pleasure that you printed the news of Sir Oswald Mosley's arrest in the fifth column of yesterday's edition."

Norman Birkett KC -- who had not yet been knighted, let alone ennobled -- was chairman of the Advisory Panel on 18B detentions. There was no legal right of appeal against 18B through the courts, but detainees could apply to the Advisory Panel for a review. Evidently Mosley did this, and the panel found against him. (Mosley would be released on health grounds in late 1943, but was then subject to house arrest for the duration.) There is no question of Birkett "interrogating Mosley for 16 hours", or of the government resorting to 18B only because they couldn't find a criminal charge. These false claims, which the article makes without citation, give off a very bad smell indeed. Khamba Tendal (talk) 18:56, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

only noteworthy as a fascist?

would it be a better idea for simplicity to change the start to say “British Fascist politician”? 2A00:23C6:D603:8001:810:1D08:391B:596C (talk) 10:47, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly not, because he also spent time as a Labour Party politician. 14.2.206.234 (talk) 08:44, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Gamer mosley" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Gamer mosley has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 3 § Gamer mosley until a consensus is reached. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:25, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Member of Parliament (United Kingdom)

Is that article title wrong? Should the phrase be "member of parliament" instead? I'd argue that "Member of Parliament" is a proper noun. I have never seen it abbreviated to "mp". Although I see that Winston Churchill uses "member of Parliament". Martinevans123 (talk) 11:01, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]