Talk:Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator

Physiology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has not yet been associated with a particular area.

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Clinical trials

ICD vs. Antiarrhythmics

Trials that show that ICDs are superior to antiarrhythmic therapy:

The Dutch Trial
AVID
Cardiac Arrest Study Hamburg (CASH)
Canadian Implantable Defibrillator Study (CIDS)
MUSTT
MADIT I
MADIT II
SCD-HeFT

Image scale?

What is the scale of the ruler in the image? The "West Germany" label on the tape makes me think it's cm, but the fact that it's divided into half, quarter, and eighth divisions makes me think it's inches. Which is right? -- RoySmith (talk) 22:21, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Its in inches. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.42.154.35 (talk) 23:33, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

EMI/RFI effects

My father experienced nauseating effects when he was near tractors and lawnmowers, and eventually concluded that it was his implanted defribrillator's sensitivity to electromagnetic interference (EMI). The effects can be mitigated by using simple shielding, such as by a sheet of aluminum foil covering the device. It would be nice to have some citations on this effect, but I haven't been able to find any yet. — Loadmaster (talk) 01:30, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Most implanted devices are already screened. The problem is the long leads into the heart.

So unless you want to wear a foil vest, you are wasting your time with foil. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.229.249.187 (talk) 19:43, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

References (in general and References section)

I just assessed this article and believe it might barely meet C criteria, though others are free to downgrade it to start class if necessary, but I felt that the content was more than worthwhile to justify C class. More references are needed, and the References section needs to be cleaned up. I might even just take a moment now to do that... Adavis444 (talk) 06:39, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, so now there is a Notes section that contains all of the footnotes, and there is a References section, containing sources of general information I suppose, somewhat akin to Wikipedia:Citing sources#Shortened footnotes. Each reference in this References section should probably be matched to the information that it is citing in order to achieve greater consistency, better referencing of individual facts, and a consistent Wikipedia system, and this must happen before this article could reach B class. Adavis444 (talk) 06:52, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Citations needed tag on QOL section

Just looking through the article and wonder if the citations needed tag on the quality of life section is still warranted. Two of the three paragraphs are heavily sourced (almost too-much-so). I think I have seen studies related to physical activities if those few sentences require some support. Thoughts?Cknoepke (talk) 15:30, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Epidemiology, Outcomes, and Therapeutic Approaches of ICD shocks

doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.428 JFW | T@lk 21:49, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Subgroups

On the whole, ICDs have a proven mortality benefit. Unfortunately the studies were underpowered to say in which subgroup the benefit was most significant. Ann Intern Med doi:10.7326/M13-1787 JFW | T@lk 14:06, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Garbage

Huge sections of this article are unreferenced.

Worse still, huge parts of it are just plain wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.101.191.209 (talk) 18:46, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, hello Everyone that had been involved in this article. I am working in a remote course on Wikipedia for medical professionals. I will be updating this article over the next few weeks. I was wondering if anyone knew of newer studies or techniques that they believe should be referenced? Akersraju11 (talk) 20:49, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lives saved in primary prevention

doi:10.7326/M17-0120 JFW | T@lk 22:30, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080516190654/http://www.brighamandwomens.org/cvcenter/videos/SuccessfulLivingICD.aspx to http://www.brighamandwomens.org/cvcenter/videos/SuccessfulLivingICD.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:37, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Wikipedia for the Medical Editor

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 29 January 2024 and 23 February 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Akersraju11 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Akersraju11 (talk) 02:49, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]