Talk:Eschscholzia californica

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Eschscholzia californica article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Plants Mid‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

California Mid‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education assignment: California Natural History

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 August 2023 and 1 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Orangesod0 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Yayav (talk) 00:58, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[16]

Not sure https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eschscholzia_californica#cite_ref-16 (for Uses California poppy leaves are used as food or garnish, while the seeds are used in cooking.)) is a valid source. It rates it edible: 1/5 and medicinal 3/5, which is insane W;ChangingUsername (talk) 11:36, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Possible typo/malapropism?

Under the section about the poppy as the state flower of California, the second sentence of the second paragraph reads: "Asserting claims of indignity, territorial dominance, and communal identity, white settlers strategically orchestrated a deliberate movement to construct a cultural identity centered around the golden poppy.[15]" (emphasis added)

The dictionary.com site defines "indignity" as "an injury to a person's dignity; slighting or contemptuous treatment; humiliating affront, insult, or injury."

I'm not sure what word was intended here (indigeneity seems possible, but since this is explicitly described as a movement by white settlers it seems -- unlikely? Or at least inappropriate, though I suppose they might have asserted it at the time. If so, it should probably be unpacked a bit.)

"Indignity" is clearly wrong, but should it be replaced or simply removed? If it should be replaced, what should it be replaced by? Anakyria (talk) 18:01, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Simply removed, and restated simply here. Thanks for pointing it out. Zefr (talk) 18:28, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]