User talk:Denelson83/Archive page 2

Hope you'll accept my apology, I wasn't aware of that. I'd have deleted it for you but I see that's already been taken care of. - Hephaestos|§ 15:26, 14 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Sorry about all this. I have attempted a brief explanation on my talk page. Some idiot is trying to cause trouble. — Trilobite (Talk) 23:57, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC)

BC Flag

Hi, Denelson83: Can you adjust the image of the BC flag? Its proportions should be 3:5, not 2:3 (as they appear to be). (The BC government's very short article on the subject is here.) -Sewing - talk 02:10, 1 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Awesome! Thanks for your quick response! -Sewing - talk 02:25, 1 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Unless you do it first, I'll update the articles later that link to the old flag. -Sewing - talk 02:27, 1 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Thanks. -Sewing - talk 02:29, 1 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Canadian message board

I noticed that you set up a Canadian wikipedians' message board, but that it's still fairly empty. Have you contacted some of the people listed at Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Canada? Though I'm Australian myself, I like Canada, so I'd like to help get this one up and running. Ambi 09:04, 2 Oct 2004 (UTC)

CBC

Not sure what's up with those logos. They were left-to-right in my browser (Firefox 9, Champagne Blue skin), which is why I set up a div to make sure they were grouped and stacked. I made sure it was displaying fine by bringing it up in IE as well (IE 6, Monobook by default); it looked fine there, too, including the captions.

Perhaps you could make a posting (Village Pump?) and see how other users are loading it... Radagast 02:21, Oct 3, 2004 (UTC)

Image:Vancouver Waterfront.jpg

<Comment deleted - general violation>

CSD

CSD stands for Candidates for speedy deletion. They're generally things like "Can I really make a page?" or "XXXXXXXYYIIQWBI!!!!!" or the ever-popular "Josh is gay!" -- Cyrius|✎ 04:49, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Re: Vandalism of "Sailor Moon" article

I agree: If I see any more bad edits from that user or to that page, I'll do just as you suggest. Provided I don't fall asleep first. -- Hadal 07:24, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Re: I want my name red again

Done. :) I'll try to keep an eye on that IP until I log off for the night. -- Hadal 06:46, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 1000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
Multi-Licensing Guide
Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR

Option 2

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

Unverified images

<Comment deleted - general violation ("Negative criticism not tolerated")>

Unverified images

<Comment deleted - general violation ("Negative criticism not tolerated")>