Talk:George Walton Academy
Appearance
(Redirected from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Walton Academy)
from VfD:
Doesn't establish notability. --fvw* 18:33, 2005 Jan 6 (UTC)
- Delete -- Not notable. Egil 19:43, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Keep -- Has potential. Gcs584 00:49, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Keep I think all school articles should be kept. Deleting them seems to me to reflect a failure to appreciate the magnitude of the information resource that Wikipedia can become. Philip 02:31, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, high schools are inherently notable, this is helpful. Wyss 03:54, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Keep and allow for organic growth. Educational institutions are inherently noteworthy. (Local coffee shops are not.) GRider\talk 19:18, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. It's tantamount to trolling to list high schools and the lister did not give a reason that has any backing from the deletion policy.Dr Zen 06:33, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Schools are inherently notable. It's also a decent stub and has potential to be expanded into an article. --Andylkl 13:35, Jan 8, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. --JuntungWu 06:35, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- keep Yuckfoo 04:43, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Keep Salazar 02:41, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- User joined Jan 9 2005.
- Delete. Nothing is inherently notable. —Ben Brockert (42) UE News 06:11, Jan 11, 2005 (UTC)
- I disagree with that 100%, countries, changes in the politcal scene, events, incidents and/or disasters on the international level are definitely noticably inherently notably notable. Some might not see schools as inherently notable, but they are in reality. --Andylkl 06:55, Jan 11, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Better than the average school article. Trilobite (Talk) 07:36, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Not encyclopedic. Gamaliel 22:41, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. The vast majority of schools are not notable. The article doesn't convince me that this one is any different. Carrp 00:18, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Keep - SimonP 02:16, Jan 19, 2005 (UTC)
There are plans to update this page in the near future. Eroediger (talk) 15:19, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
end moved discussion
Promotion and copyvio
[edit]I've removed extensive promotional and overly-close paraphrased material from the school's website. Wikipedia is not here to promote the school. This isn't the school's PR site. Meters (talk) 03:57, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
An editor has repeatedly removed reliably sourced information about this article because it pertains to it's founding as an all-white school for the purpose of avoiding integration, and its student body's composition as all-white for many years afterward. Should this article be censored? Jacona (talk) 17:01, 17 August 2021 (UTC)