Talk:Interstate 395 (Virginia–District of Columbia)

U.S. Roads: Interstates / District of Columbia / Virginia Mid‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Topics	Interstate Highways
Locations	District of Columbia Virginia
	This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.
	This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

United States: District of Columbia Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Washington, D.C. portal This article is supported by WikiProject District of Columbia (assessed as Mid-importance).

Name

I am dropping the Washington, DC from the article name as only a small portion on this highway lies in the district and the majority lies in the state in Virginia, thus leading to the article name being deceptive. --User:Boothy443 | comhrÚ 20:39, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Bridge dates

Rush Hour Pic?

There is no way that picture is rush hour! Maybe we should rename it! User:nbdinz 17:43, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

HOV Law

Hasn't the HOV for hybrids been extended? KevinPuj 11:18, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sort of. My understanding is that any hybrid registered with special plates is grandfathered to use all HOV lanes through June 2007. Any new hybrids registered this year are eligible to use the HOV-2 lanes (I-66) but not HOV-3 (I-395) through the middle of next year. It was on a VDOT site; I'd need to track it down again. —C.Fred (talk) 19:34, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Signage: "I-95"

FWIW, the street underneath L'Enfant Promenade (10th St. SW, I guess) has signs that still direct motorists to Interstate 95 (or, 95 and 295), with ~~"Washington DC"~~ "District of Columbia" underneath the word "Interstate" inside the shield. The signs do look like they've been there for a long time. I thought this was worth mentioning in the article but all I can offer for proof is an eyewitness account. Maybe next time I'll have a camera with me. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 16:28, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You mean the ones in commons:Category:Interstate 95? --NE2 23:19, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes! This sign. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 02:39, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 15:36, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maps on exit list

Twice the maps have been removed from the exit list under the guise that they don't belong, citing WP:ELG and WP:USRD/MTF. I argue that those are mere guidelines, not firm standards, as the language in both indicates (the first, explicitly so, the second by implication). That the maps aren't perfect is no justification for their removal -- if they can be improved, let them stand until improved. I'm going to put them back in if there aren't any good responses here indicating why they should remain out. Additionally, "upside down" is a matter of opinion -- they are oriented to go in the same direction as the exit list so they can be read in parallel. Jkatzen (talk) 18:19, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Development on top of I-395

A developer may be erecting several buildings on top of I-395 near the Massachusetts Avenue exit. (Source from The Washington Post: [1]) Not sure if that should be included in this article, since I-395's routing itself will not actually change. Thoughts? ~ Quacks Like a Duck (talk) 18:34, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Are the "Center Leg Freeway Development" and "Capitol Crossing" the same development? 71.163.231.27 (talk) 04:13, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Interstate 395 Alternate

Could someone either add information about Interstate 395 Alternate, or start a new article? I was walking around Washington, DC in either August or September, and I saw (and took pictures of) signs of the road. Allen (talk) 04:09, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If someone wants to see my photos, they are at File:Interstate 395 Alternate 1.jpg and File:Interstate 395 Alternate 2.jpg. I would have added the information, but I need a map of the route. Allen (Morriswa) (talk) 01:59, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

An editor added a section about this route. Can someone update and correct the date? I was there in late 2011 and took the above two pictures of signs that were up back then. Charlotte Allison (Morriswa) (talk) 11:50, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is no evidence of I-395 Alt. on Google Maps. The signage along US 50 is merely a suggested route for southbound travelers. There are also signs near Independence Ave. and Washington Ave. for a northbound I-395 Alt., but that is an entirely different routing altogether. It's safe to say that the signs do not represent any official routing of an I-395 Alt. route. Greggens (talk) 20:07, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

City of Arlington?

Is there some reason why this article has referred to the nonexistent "City of Arlington" for so long? Doctor Whom (talk) 03:06, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch. Should we replace it with "Arlington County" spanning both columns? —C.Fred (talk) 03:12, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 11 June 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Andrewa (talk) 22:34, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Interstate 395 (District of Columbia–Virginia) → Interstate 395 (Virginia–District of Columbia) – Southernmost commonwealth/district needs to be listed first, per WP:IH. Greggens (talk) 21:00, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support. This is a non-controversial application of a non-controversial WikiProject guideline (WP:IH § Naming conventions: "If the Interstate enters more than two states, then list all states in the name, beginning with the western/southernmost state. "). — AjaxSmack 13:11, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Interstate 395 (Virginia–District of Columbia). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050405054756/http://virginiadot.org/comtravel/hov-novasched.asp to http://www.virginiadot.org/comtravel/hov-novasched.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:20, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can't see the map

I haven't been able to see the map in the Infobox since this change was made by User:Fredddie at 03:26, 3 September 2018. Is it just me? Otherwise is there any reason not to undo that change (which seems to restore the map)? @Fredddie: Can you comment on this? -- Pemilligan (talk) 16:10, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It does not render for me, either. I purged the page. The change that broke the map might not be Fredddie's edit; it could be an issue with the maplink call that generates the map. —C.Fred (talk) 16:17, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I see it fairly often where the maps don't always render. Usually as C.Fred suggested it just needs a purge or three. Anyway, I moved the data over to Commons commons:Data:Interstate 395 (Virginia–District of Columbia).map and changed how {{maplink}} looks for the data thusly. I saw a map before I commented here! –Fredddie ™ 01:17, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]