User talk:Junesix
Hello Junesix and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.
Here are some tips to help you get started:
- To sign your posts (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes).
- Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area.
- If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk
- Follow the Wikipedia:Simplified Ruleset
- Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
- Remember Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
- Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!
Good luck!
List of architects
[edit]Hi. Thanks for your note. My mistake, and I have no problem with you putting them back. The ones I removed were Future Systems, MVRDV, SITE Environmental Design, Open Architecture, SPLITTERWERK. Only two of these only had articles in existence. Open Architecture is also a computing term, and I believe that there is a computing firm called Future Systems. I do feel that the List of architects should be a list of names of individual architects rather than firms - this would help avoid any future confusion. Deb 12:40, 1 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Architecture lists
[edit]I agree with moving firms into their own list, and keeping list of architects to individuals only. Much cleaner that way. Thanks. Isomorphic 22:27, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Thanks for the copyedit, my grammar is not too good, and I've looked at that page for so long I can't see straight! Thanks a lot Giano 22:12, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Richard Cassels Again
[edit]Yes, fine do what you like. If the English word does not translate as 'triumph', I don't know the right word, 'crescendo ?' - ' Climax?', I've changed it anyway. On the last paragraph don't be too brutal it is Ireland and rococo after all!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Junesix. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)