Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alastor Moody

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. —Korath (Talk) 00:02, Mar 21, 2005 (UTC)

Alastor Moody

In this example, how is encyclopedic notability being demonstrated? --GRider\^talk 22:58, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• GRider, please tell me what you think should happen to Alastor Moody. It is your responsiblity as nominator to clearly tell your fellow Wikipedians what you think should happen as a result of the nomination. —Markaci 2005-03-15 T 23:08 Z
• Keep, important recurring character. Merging this kind of thing wouldn't really help anyone. Kappa 23:19, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Strong Keep Important character from a very famous book series. 131,000 Google Hits as "Mad Eye Moody". Come on, now. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 23:51, Mar 15, 2005 (UTC)
• EXTREMELY STRONG KEEP. Major, major character in the Hary Potter series. Are you even bothering to do any research? DaveTheRed 01:51, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. WP:POINT. —Korath (Talk) 05:16, Mar 16, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, cleanup and expand. Megan1967 05:39, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, of course. Xezbeth 05:56, Mar 16, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep as major character. Focus of the main plot in book four, and important in book five. Radiant! 08:34, Mar 16, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Mad-Eye Moody is a fairly important character in Books four and five of the Harry Potter . Capitalistroadster 10:35, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. And he's even more notable than Mundungus Fletcher Lectonar 10:59, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. This is a very notable character, usually nicknamed "Mad-Eye Moody". GRider ought to stop his crusade against Harry Potter characters. Sjakkalle 09:21, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • I'm pretty sure it's not a crusade, don't worry. Radiant_* 09:47, Mar 17, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. None of this "extremely strong" silliness, mind you. Just your plain, average, run-of-the mill keep. If he's going to appear in the next movie, he's not exactly minor, but I don't see the point of all the fuss. — JIP | Talk 14:16, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• keep please do a little bit of research before nominating articles and wasting peoples time. kaal 20:04, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. This is a ridiculous nomination. Rather major character in the single most popular children's/YA book series ever. I see few possibilities here: WP:POINT, nominating an article in an area in which one is ignorant... can't think of much else. -- Jmabel | Talk 05:56, Mar 18, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep I would like to see this user banned from nominating on this page he does not follows the nominations guidelines and consequently wastes a great deal of other users time which could be more productively spent on improving articles. Wincoote 13:54, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• This nomination is not correctly formed. Please read the instructions. Chris 03:01, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• keep Yuckfoo 21:12, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.