Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Billy-Corgan.com

Billy-Corgan.com was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was to delete. Cool Hand Luke 09:50, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)

A non-notable fan site. Rdsmith4— Dan | Talk 01:41, 20 Nov 2004 (UTC)

• Delete. Deletionist 01:57, 20 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Delete There is a link to this site in the external links for Billy Corgan. That is more than sufficient. DCEdwards1966 02:21, Nov 20, 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. —tregoweth 02:23, Nov 20, 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Looks like feeble spamvertising to me. Anyway, it's vacuous. Hoary 02:40, 20 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Delete; the info might warrant a mention somewhere, but it doesn't need its own article. Everyking 04:35, 20 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Delete: We are not a web guide, and it already got its mention elsewhere. Geogre 04:54, 20 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Delete: Not ready to define all the websites out there yet. Bensaccount 05:48, 20 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Delete --fvw* 06:14, 2004 Nov 21 (UTC)
• Delete. Does not warrant its own article. --*drew 07:14, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Extreme delete. [[User:Radman1|RaD Man (talk)]] 21:42, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Delete--Blade Hirato 20:59, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Delete Just mention it on "Billy Corgan". It's only a stubstub anyway. - Frank 02:25, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Delete [[User:Squash|Squash (Talk)]] 09:06, Nov 25, 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.