User talk:Harry Hayfield

Welcome!

Hello, Harry Hayfield, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Lst 27 22:39, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Ceredigion

Hey there, I saw you put a lot of text into the history of the Ceredigion, I was wondering where it's all from because it mentions Encyclopedia Britannia at the top. (You might want to read Wikipedia:Cite sources - it's important we have references so everything is verifiable!)

I was thinking perhaps we should split the text up slightly, most of it relates to Cardigan or Cardiganshire - the first constituency with the name Ceredigion was created in 1997.

Regards, Joolz 17:01, 12 July 2005 (UTC) (PS: you can reply on your talk page here, thanks)[reply]

I hope I have this right, if not then HELP! The iniital comment from the Enclyopedia Brittianica is from the CD - Rom version, however the rest of the article comes from my own research using a book that is only available in print in the UK.

The constituency of Ceredigion has the following history:

1832 - 1885 Ceredigion County and Borough 1885 - 1983 Ceredigion County (known as Cardiganshire in English) 1983 - 1992 Ceredigion and Pembroke North 1997 - 2005 Ceredigion

Thanks for the reply! (By the way, you can sign comments you make by typing ~~~~) - I think the official name for the constituency was Cardigan/Cardiganshire rather than Ceredigion. What I suggest is having articles on Cardiganshire which would cover the history of the Cardiganshire constituency 1832-1983, an article on Cardigan which would cover the Cardigan borough constituency 1832-1885 and an article on Ceredigion and Pembroke North which would cover the 1983-1992 period. From 1997 onwards we should use the Ceredigion article. This way it's clear for everyone, the official names would be used because I suspect that's what he'd have been called, and also refered to in the Commons, splitting it up like this would make sure everything is clear. I've moved some of the biographical details of the MPs to their own articles, by the way. Oh, lastly, we need to make sure we cite sources so the information is verifiable! It would be great if you could put the books you've used for the information in a ==References== section on the page. Thanks! Joolz 17:49, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Not the Harry Hayfield?

From the LibDem Yahoo pages? How you doing ? doktorb 09:21, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I am indeed, yes. Harry Hayfield 13:11, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Cool - Liam Pennington here, not been on the pages for a while, hope all is well. Still number crunching I see =) Hope to see you around the Election pages here doktorb 09:38, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Don't you worry Liam, if there's a majority vote election in the offing, I'll be there, just one small question though, where are the election pages? Harry Hayfield 22:07, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

UK General Elections I think doktorb 13:30, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Querying my vote

Hello, Harry Hayfield. Thanks for your inquiry. According to Kate's Tool, you currently have 158 edits, several of which were made after the start of the elections (January 9). I double-checked this manually, counting your edits, and the number prior to January 9 was indeed less than 150. The suffrage rules state that a voter must have registered prior to September 30 and made more than 150 edits by the start of the election (January 9); thus, you do not have suffrage in this election. While I understand your frustration (I myself was denied suffrage in the last Board election) and the possible confusion of the last-minute rule change (the 150 edit requirement was added on the day before the elections started, something which I opposed), there's nothing I can do about it. I hope you understand that, and thanks for your understanding. If there's anything else I can answer for you, please don't hesistate to ask. Thanks! Flcelloguy (A note?) 21:56, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, that's quite all right thanks. I just wasn't aware of the complexities of the rules Harry Hayfield 22:00, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that Harry, I thought you were well over the requirements. I wonder if you had anon edits before that which could be counted, but anyway thanks for your support. David | Talk 22:27, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dunfermline and West Fife by-election, 2006

Hi Harry. Thanks for your contributions. Just a note about the line you put in the by-election article: "As the date has now been set for February 9th 2006, I will post tomorrow the actual moving of the writ from Hansard." Comments like this - in the first person and about potential changes to the article - should be in the edit summary or on the talk page, but not in the article itself. Thanks. --Whouk (talk) 11:15, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply. It would be fine to put in a line like "The text of the writ has yet to be published" if you're planning to put it in once it has. The main thing to avoid is using "I" in an article. Cheers. --Whouk (talk) 23:15, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Swingometer_1992.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Swingometer_1992.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 23:19, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The image was taken with my poor quality webcam from a recording of the Newsnight programme in September 2005. Harry Hayfield 23:18, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:County-map.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:County-map.gif. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 03:00, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

Page move

Hi Harry. Your page move from Moray (Scottish Parliament constituency) to Moray by-election 2006 puzzled me as the two subjects are very different, and there is already an article for the by-election at Moray by-election, 2006 which will expand as the by-election continues (cf. Dunfermline and West Fife by-election, 2006 and Dunfermline and West Fife (UK Parliament constituency)). Consequently, I've suggested on the article Talk page that the article be moved back to Moray (Scottish Parliament constituency) and that Moray by-election 2006 be redirected to Moray by-election, 2006. Please add your comments and support/oppose this suggestion on Talk:Moray by-election 2006. Thanks. —Wh o uk (talk) 15:24, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

UK blizzard, 2006 deletion nomination

AfD nomination of UK blizzard, 2006

I've nominated UK blizzard, 2006, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that UK blizzard, 2006 satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UK blizzard, 2006 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of UK blizzard, 2006 during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. -Canley 23:57, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Missing Calculations

Hey Harry =)

I think if you put a source to the calculations for the Boundary Changes in the article, that should be alright.

My fear is the next UK general election article is now spreading somewhat wide and may have to be cut down once your sourced section goes in. I may put a note on the article's talk page to ask for ideas on how to keep the article within reasonable, er, boundaries =)

doktorb _words^deeds 19:34, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

General election articles

Hi -

I've removed some blank sections you added to various articles on general elections in the UK. If you were planning to add information, then please feel free to add them back in at that time. Warofdreams talk 02:53, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was indeed, yes, but needed to find the materials to add to them Harry Hayfield 08:43, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you requested a peer review for the article on the 1983 general election. Did you intend to add this to Wikipedia:Peer review, or did you intend it as a request for help with just one section of the article? If it's the latter, I'd be happy to help - just leave a message on my talk page. Warofdreams talk 02:47, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pass! Basically, what I am trying to do is to find out the best way of producing that information in the form a table, that I can then adjust to match all the other tables. Harry Hayfield 08:36, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:UK_2005.gif.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:UK_2005.gif.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:38, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Next United Kingdom general Election

Harry

Thanks for the input to the UK general election page, but I think the Target list is perhaps too much...The article is already too large as it is, and if you include three of four tables per party, it's going to get quite difficult to manage.

Can I request you include just the top 10 targets for each party? I am going to move the boundary stuff to a new page to avoid the size issues. I think you should do something with the target tables to help keep the article managable

Cheers

doktorb _words^deeds 07:02, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly, you see that's the problem the Conservatives have. They need 112 gains just to get a majority of 1! Harry Hayfield 09:54, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tables

Hi -

Thanks for your contributions. Article pages aren't a good place to put requests for help; that's what the talk pages are for. Table syntax is a little complex, and if you don't feel ready to attempt it, could I suggest either posting data on talk pages and requesting assistance, or (better still) using a simpler format - just start each line of data with a * to produce a new line starting with a bullet. If you've got any other queries on this, don't hesitate to ask me. Warofdreams talk 01:16, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Does that look better on the 1964 General Election? Harry Hayfield 20:48, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that looks good. Warofdreams talk 10:37, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am not the best on tables either! I get stuck, but using existing tables I copy them and try to modify for my own use. doktorb _words^deeds 13:33, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Rigadon.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Rigadon.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:08, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Doctor Who Fandom

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the external links you added to the page Doctor Who fandom do not comply with our guidelines for external links. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --The Missing Hour 19:11, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Elections 1964-2005

Feel free to email away - my Wikipedia email is enabled, or direct to sam.blacketer@googlemail.com. I don't, though, know exactly what it is you're proposing. I do know we have articles on every MP who has sat in Parliament since 1959 (save for three, which should be completed fairly soon), but a lot of these are fairly useless stubs that merely give dates of birth and death, party, and constituency represented. Sam Blacketer 20:50, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Boundary Changes by Constituency

Hi Harry. Have you got any sources for your article Boundary Changes by Constituency? If you can't attribute the work then I'm afraid it will have to be deleted. AndrewRT(Talk) 23:02, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I do indeed. It's published on the Press Association page for the elections, I hav no idea though how to link it to the main article though Harry Hayfield 17:43, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Titles 1987.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Titles 1987.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ilse @ 11:35, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for adding a fair use rationale. I believe the purpose of use is still too unspecific, since every image is used to illustrate articles. I believe that the purpose of use should explain why a certain image is used (fair use) in a specific article. – Ilse @ 11:53, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:1964 Titles.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:1964 Titles.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jay32183 20:33, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:1970 Titles.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:1970 Titles.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jay32183 20:35, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:1997 Titles.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:1997 Titles.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jay32183 19:46, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Steep Holm.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Steep Holm.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:11, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:BBC UK 2001 Map.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BBC UK 2001 Map.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:55, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:UK 1992 (Notionals).jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:UK 1992 (Notionals).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:15, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Titles 1955.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Titles 1955.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 01:52, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Titles 1979.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Titles 1979.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:17, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

National Assembly for Wales 2007 boundary changes

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article National Assembly for Wales 2007 boundary changes, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of National Assembly for Wales 2007 boundary changes. B.Wind (talk) 03:15, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Doctor Who newsletter, March 2008

The Space-Time Telegraph

The WikiProject Doctor Who newsletter

Issue 1

March 2008

Project News: We have five new participants: Sm9800, Seanor3, T saston, Type 40, Jammy0002.; One editor has left the project: StuartDD.; The Doctor Who portal has expanded to increase the number of selected stories to 33.

Articles of note

New featured articles

None

New featured article candidates

Voyage of the Damned (Doctor Who) (FAC)

New good articles

Delisted articles: None

Proposals: A proposal for changing the layout of the episode pages is under way here.; A discussion about the formatting of the cast lists in episode pages is under way here.; A discussion to move United Nations Intelligence Taskforce to UNIT is under way here.
News: The Torchwood project has become a task-force under the project's scope.; The Torchwood series 2 finale airs on 4th April, and the 4th series of Doctor Who will start to air on 5th April.

For the Doctor Who project, Sceptre ^(talk) 18:28, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You have received this letter because you are on the newsletter recipients list. To opt-out, please remove your name.

Image source problem with Image:Steep Holm.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Steep Holm.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:48, 23 May 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -mattbuck (Talk) 14:48, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Are you the Harry Hayfield

Who writes for Doctor Who Online?

Mael-Num (talk) 22:02, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I used to (but still contribute to the site) Harry Hayfield (talk) 08:31, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Titles 1987.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Titles 1987.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:05, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for Image:Bob Mathias (USA).jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bob Mathias (USA).jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 00:07, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Willy Fog.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Willy Fog.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 07:00, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ceredigion template

You bemoan the lack of template for Ceredigion. Will this do: {{Ceredigion}}? ~Geaugagrrl^talk 20:05, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Warwickshire Council election, 2009

Hi, have you got a reference for the summary information you supplied at Warwickshire Council election, 2009. I can find detail information in a couple of places but no summary information. Keith D (talk) 00:18, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, when it comes to sources I can't remember how to do it. The source is http://info.warwickshire.gov.uk/rss/elections09-rss.xml Harry Hayfield (talk) 21:26, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I located that page but could not find the summary detail that you created. Did you add up the figures from each result to get the summary table? Keith D (talk) 23:04, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I did indeed plus that information was published in all national papers and online at www.bbc.co.uk/elections09 the following day Harry Hayfield (talk) 18:51, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Labour targets for the 2010 United Kingdom general election

An article that you have been involved in editing, Labour targets for the 2010 United Kingdom general election, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Labour targets for the 2010 United Kingdom general election. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Hekerui (talk) 22:32, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ceredigion County Council election, 2012

The article Ceredigion County Council election, 2012 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced article making claims about a future event with no evidence of its existence at all

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:49, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your article has been moved to AfC space

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Harry Hayfield/Ceredigion County Council election, 2012 has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ceredigion County Council election, 2012, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 15:21, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ceredigion County Council election, 2012.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via live help, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! - Happysailor ^(Talk) 17:57, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ceredigion County Council election, 2012.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via live help, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Dalisays (talk) 15:19, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Local Elections 2012 in Ceredigion

I have been duly nominated as the Liberal Democrats candidate for the Llansantffraed ward. The nominations were signed and verified by the election officer for Ceredigion. Harry Hayfield (talk) 22:35, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Swingometer

Hello, Harry Hayfield. You have new messages at Talk:Swingometer.
Message added -- Trevj (talk) 12:16, 24 May 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited All Over the Place (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pass Out (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ceredigion County Council election, 2012 concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ceredigion County Council election, 2012, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 13:39, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Ceredigion County Council election, 2012

Hello Harry Hayfield. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Ceredigion County Council election, 2012.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ceredigion County Council election, 2012}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 14:00, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Mysterious Cities of Gold, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kix (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pingu (series 1), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Koreana. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Harry Hayfield. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Harry Hayfield. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ceredigion County Council election, 2017

Hello, Harry Hayfield. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Ceredigion County Council election, 2017, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Meatsgains (talk) 16:45, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ceredigion Council Election 2017

I just wanted to thank you for helping complete the list of nominations for the county council elections this year (being a candidate and trying to complete Wikipedia entries is not as easy as some people make it out to be) Harry Hayfield (talk) 06:32, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome and good luck in the election! Humu5461 (talk) 22:19, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Harry Hayfield. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Harry Hayfield. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dudley North Election 2019

Ian Austin to stand as Independent in Election, please add to candidate list https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/black-country/former-labour-mp-ian-austin-17172673

East Antrim

What's this edit to East Antrim (UK Parliament constituency) all about? If I didn't know you better I'd have thought vandalism? Valenciano (talk) 21:31, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sammy Wilson (former DUP MP for Antrim East) was duly nominated yesterday as Sammy Samuel in the official documentation released by the Electoral Office of Northern Ireland. I was therefore merely updating the candidate list to be accurate and cited the document Harry Hayfield (talk) 15:29, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The EONI list doesn't mention Sammy Samuel (Sammy is a short form of Samuel anyway) and the reference you provided is from a 1986 science journal. Valenciano (talk) 19:19, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, so I don't know how to cite something. I have since been informed that the EONI list you have is a later version than the one released at the time of editing, and that Sammy Wilson has been duly nominated and replaced the Sammy Samuel (which they have apologised for as a clerical error) Harry Hayfield (talk) 17:52, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. Easy to do and the fault lies with EONI, was just checking. Valenciano (talk) 19:38, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Henry Willink

The page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Willink contains a link to a Conservative Party sponsored organisation and has been used in the campaign for the election. Could someone please verify the information attached to the citiation? Harry Hayfield (talk) 08:10, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:17, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WIkiProject Doctor Who Newsletter: July 2024

The Space-Time Telegraph
Volume II, Issue I — July 2024
Brought to you by the editors of WikiProject Doctor Who

Okay–ooh. New ~~teeth~~ newsletter. That's weird...

Hello!

Welcome to the first regenerated issue of The Space-Time Telegraph, the official newsletter of WikiProject Doctor Who. We hope it finds you well in your safe travels across the Whoniverse! This newsletter was founded in 2008 and seemed to get lost in the time vortex quite quickly. Thanks to the Doctor dragging Sutekh through the time vortex and bringing life by bringing death to death (yeah... I'm a little confused too), it seems to have regenerated. The writing staff hopes to bring you future editions quarterly.

For this first edition, we have created an updated version of our mailing list that includes any active editors who previously had their usernames included in our participants list. If you do not wish to receive future editions, please remove your name from the mailing list. If you no longer wish to participate in the project, please also remove your name from the participants list.

I think that's enough about the newsletter for now. Let's dive into interesting things happening within the Doctor Who side of Wikipedia. Geronimooooo.....

Big Spike in Productivity

During 2024, the project has scored 8 GAs, 2 FLs and a GT, up from last year's 4 GAs and a GT. Several additional things are in the pipeline, with a bunch of things currently having been nominated with some mix of OlifanofmrTennant, TheDoctorWho, and Pokelego999 having their names attached to them. Allow me to look into the nominees.

Series 14: As of July 18th, every single episode has been sent to GAN, with "Boom", "73 Yards", and "The Devil's Chord" having made it to GA.
2023 Specials: Early in the year, as part of trying to not lose the WikiCup, Ollie sent "The Star Beast" (still salty about the move) to GAN. It was reviewed by frequent collaborator (fly high) of hers, but failed. She then fixed it up and sent it back where it passed. Later "The Giggle" was expanded and sent to GA, followed shortly by "Wild Blue Yonder". WBY received help by JustAnotherCompanion, a pretty fresh user. This other companion chose not to be listed as co-nom. A page was created for "Destination: Skaro" and quickly got GA status.
The Daleks' Master Plan was also sent to GAN by Rhain. It passed to join Rhain's other First Doctor content, being the fourth season three article to get the green check.
Peter Capaldi: The filmography and newly created awards of Capaldi were both sent to FLC and passed. Capaldi's main page was sent to GA, though due to some minor incompetence on the part of the nominator it was failed.

Proposals to the WikiProject

A recent proposal at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Doctor Who suggested potential improvements and suggestions for the main page of the project, as well as discussions about the project overall. The proposals are as follows:

The Task Forces section should be removed due to inactivity in the Torchwood Task Force, and a lack of significant interest in creating further Task Forces.
The freenode channel no longer works and should be removed due to most discussion taking place on site.
Due to the low quality of Lungbarrow and Jubilee despite being sample articles, these articles should either be removed as samples or improved. Additionally, the "sample device" has a very small application field, and should be removed from the sample articles section.
An updates infobox should be included, similarly to those used by Wikipedia:VGCHAR.
Radio Times's Doctor Who sections should be included in the references section due to their benefits for the project sourcing wise.
The Deletion Discussion archive should be removed, or have work invested in updating it, due to its lack of updates.

If you feel you have any thoughts or suggestions on these matters, or on any other matters pertaining to the project and its main page, feel free to chime in the ongoing discussion.

Discussions of Note

A move discussion is currently underway on whether or not Doctor Who series 14 should be moved to Doctor Who season 1 (2024). The discussion also involves conversation on a few other adjacent articles. If you have an opinion on the matter please read over the discussion or leave comments.

Contributors

TheDoctorWho (talk)
Pokelego999 (talk)
Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her)

If you wish to contribute to future editions of the newsletter, leave a message on the WikiProject talk page or reach out to one of the current contributors listed above.

If you do not wish to receive future editions of the Space-Time Telegraph, please remove your name from our our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]