Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rocking stoned

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD 02:05, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Rocking stoned

[edit]
  • Delete. Non-notable, few to none true google results. Eddyrichards 15:37, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC).
  • Keep. Vfd by anon, vote not signed, voter has less than 100 edits. Voter not eligible to vote. Article stood 36 days unedited, unchallenged, without a single comment on the talk page. Gebruiker:Dedalus 13:04, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment: This was apparently either never listed on vfd or removed out of process, so I'm bringing it to today's page for resolution. —Korath (Talk) 00:35, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC)
  • Merge and redirect to Rolling Stones. If it can be verified. RickK 04:58, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC)
  • Ha. Ha. Ha. Delete. Soundguy99 07:27, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, not notable, hoax. Megan1967 07:32, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Merge if verified. Delete if not. Dedalus, I think anons can vote as long as they give a solid reasoning. But that's just me. Mgm|(talk) 07:38, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC)
    • The nominating anon was Eddyrichards, not signed in (or possibly not registered yet). —Korath (Talk) 09:37, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete as hoax. Oh and yeah, anons can nominate. But Dedalus is from the Dutch 'pedia which may (or may not) have different rules. Radiant_* 08:37, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC)
  • Anonymous users can nominate and can vote, but by the English-language Wikipedia's policies, the admin resolving the VfD will typically discount votes from anons; however, valid substantiated arguments from anons can still override larger numbers of less-validly-supported votes from registered users. Barno 19:36, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Celebrate tomorrow the Fiftieth Day in history of Rocking stoned

[edit]

And then it will definitely fall in the category Bad Jokes And Other Deleted Nonsense (BJAODN) - in which it had been placed on day 1. Is Eddy family of Keith? At least one guy could laugh about it. I shouldn't have added [[Category:BJAODN]] at the end of the article as Wikipedia:Bad jokes and other deleted nonsense falls in another Category, that is Bad jokes and other undeleted nonsense. Some guys called it a hoax which I do believe to be a compliment in this case. Thanks! Gebruiker:Dedalus 08:26, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Rocking_stoned&oldid=49905067"