Talk:Heckler & Koch P11

Firearms Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / European / German

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force

Rewritten

I have rewritten HK P11 on HK P11/Temp, without copied matter, as requested. I have since found that the culprit was User:207.179.109.166. 20:27, 7 November 2004 User:Anthony Appleyard

Redirect

HK 4 P11 should not redirect to this page. This designation references a conventional 7.65x17mm HK 4 pistol formerly issued by the West Berlin police. D.E. Watters 03:36, May 23, 2005 (UTC)

Pop culture references....

There appears to be a number of unsourced or poorly sourced pop culture references in the article at the present. Any objections to removing these?--Surv1v4l1st ^{(Talk|Contribs)} 03:10, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No objection, the pop culture trivia is not noteworthy. In the meantime, the P11 is definitely not "relatively well-known" as the article says, either. ROG5728 (talk) 04:09, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks for the reply. I went ahead and cleaned out the pop cultures references.--Surv1v4l1st ^{(Talk|Contribs)} 14:36, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

HKPRO

I have deleted a citation to HKPRO.com. It is not a reliable source for Wikipedia articles because its articles are anonymously posted and there's no discernible editorial review process. See WP:V for general rules, and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Firearms#HKPRO/ hkpro.com for a specific discussion of this source. Rezin (talk) 23:49, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sent back to manufacturer?

The article doesn't mention that it needs to be sent back to its manufacturer to be reloaded other than stating the SPP-1 doesn't. Also, the prior sentence about the increased barrels is inconcise and the SPP-1 article has 'underwater pistol' in the title, which this doesn't, despite both being underwater pistols. Drone Better (talk)