Talk:Azilian

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Azilian article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Basque Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Basque, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Basque Country, Basque people, Basque language, history and culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BasqueWikipedia:WikiProject BasqueTemplate:WikiProject BasqueBasque articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Spain Low‑importance

	Spain portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archaeology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

don't know

don't know about the Asturian.

It gets a mention in the last paragraph here [1] and seems to be the subject of: Clark, Geoffrey A. 1983. The Asturian of Cantabria: Early Holocene Hunter-Gatherers in Northern Spain. Tucson: University of Arizona Press. Whether it's considered sufficiently distinct from the Azilian though, I can't find out. adamsan 19:43, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC)

10000 BC

10000 BC is not 10000 years ago. 10000 BC is 12000 years ago, or 10000 years ago is 8000 BC. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.21.188.225 (talk) 07:03, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ignorant! [BP] is NOT "ago". BTW, we menawhile have very fine calebrated dates BC. It is extreme substandard!2A02:8108:9640:1A68:5D4F:2DED:1B2:160F (talk) 15:33, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Venus of Brassempouy?

Venus of Brassempouy is from 29,000 BC and is from the Augnacian and Gravettian Negroid "Cro Magnon" Cultures. If your going to use the picture you should have those cultures in the SEE ALSO section. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.112.243.125 (talk) 04:34, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Azilian. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100217065627/http://www.beloit.edu:80/logan/exhibitions/virtual_exhibitions/before_history/europe/index.php to http://www.beloit.edu/logan/exhibitions/virtual_exhibitions/before_history/europe/index.php#mf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:07, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Map

I would like to add the Polish map on Commons, but need more certainty that it is correct. And a date is needed - this would be pretty late if correct at all, I think. Anyone? Johnbod (talk) 14:17, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If I understand correctly, you reverted the addition of this map with the edit summary "oh dear no" and then came here asking if the map is "correct"? My additions were informed by de:Federmesser-Gruppen. It appears that Federmesser culture and Azilian have been used as synonyms by some authors but not by others. That is, the term "Azilian" has a narrow and a wider sense. See also this, "the character of an Azilian assemblage has never been strictly defined". In other words, there is no single objective way of deciding whether the map is "correct". The situation is complex, and it isn't entirely clear how "oh dear no" is in any way a helpful or appropriate contribution to resolving this. --dab (𒁳) 11:37, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, there was more to the reversion than that. This doesn't seem to support the map though. As the article notes at more than one point, the geographical area of the term has been contracting over many years. Johnbod (talk) 14:02, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AZILIAN = SERBIAN

According to DNA analysis, it is all about I2 HAPLOGROUPS that is Serbian culture and genetics! Use genetics to understand - STOP MANIPULATIONS — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.226.252.143 (talk) 09:16, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]