User talk:Jds
Hi. I like your additions to the Temple Lot and Elijah Message churches. I've inserted them in List of articles about Mormonism.
Thanks for cleaning up the article on Jakob Lorber. It's a major improvement. - Gwalla 20:39, May 24, 2004 (UTC)
Article for Deletion
[edit]Hello. Since you are the original creator/contributor of Pigle.ask, I think you ought to be notified that this article has been nominated for deletion, with a strong consensus towards deleting it. If you would like to participate in this debate, please post at the discussion page. Thanks! Nimur 13:50, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
DSSP (programming)
[edit]A {{prod}} template has been added to the article DSSP (programming), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. B. Wolterding 18:01, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
Merger proposed: DSSP (programming) → Setun
[edit]It has been proposed to merge the content of DSSP (programming) into Setun. Since you have previously edited one of these articles, I thought you might be interested. You're welcome to participate in the discussion if you like. --B. Wolterding 07:51, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
Nomination of W. A. Draves for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/W. A. Draves (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
schetm (talk) 05:07, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for James Strang
[edit]James Strang has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Nikkimaria (talk) 00:50, 1 January 2024 (UTC)