Talk:Communist Party of Nepal

Socialism Mid‑importance

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Nepal Low‑importance

	Nepal portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics: Political parties Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled

"controls most of the country" in what respect? political? territory? military? Can that statement be classed as NPOV? Please provide facts to support this statement. RedWolf 06:09, Nov 28, 2003 (UTC)

Sorry, didn't cite source there. It was the CPN (gasp) quoting a government spokesperson, from memory. It was supported by a third party news report that quoted an anonymous British military source stating that the CPN was basically going to take the country. I have read so many reports on the place in the last week or so they kind of blur together, but I recognise the importance. I will try to dig some sources up tomorrow, if I have time (it will be circa 24 hours from now ...) -Pratyeka 14:33, 28 Nov 2003 (UTC)

While I don't support communism, I can understand to some extent why the Maoists started the war. I went to Nepal in 2002 and saw some of the living conditions and definitely something should be done about it. However, on the other hand, war and violence are never the answer to a problem. When we trekked into Lukla from Jiri, us westerners were never confronted by the Maoists although we knew they were out there among us. Unfortunately, they did harass our guides and sirdar out of our sight (they later told us once we were above Lukla). I have been reading The Kathmandu Post stories on their web site and with all the violence and killing of innocent people by the Maoists, how can the Communist Party rightfully call it the "People's War"? RedWolf 19:27, Nov 28, 2003 (UTC)

Family tree

There are so many CPNs with splits, mergers and renames that a family tree would help.--Rumping (talk) 07:18, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, User:Horses In The Sky did one. However, there are many details of the Nepalese communist movement that are somewhat shady and undocumented, making such an attempt a little difficult. What would be needed is a Communism in Nepal article, defining all the different splits and groupings. --Soman (talk) 08:36, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I assume you are talking about Image:Nepal Communism table.JPG. Thanks --Rumping (talk) 08:29, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The problem, as I tried to imply in my last post, is that there are several faults in that image. --Soman (talk) 10:31, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Communist Party of Nepal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070206150938/http://www.asianstudies.emory.edu/sinhas/abstr0202.html to http://www.asianstudies.emory.edu/sinhas/abstr0202.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:02, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]