Talk:Handsworth, South Yorkshire

Sheffield Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sheffield, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sheffield on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SheffieldWikipedia:WikiProject SheffieldTemplate:WikiProject SheffieldSheffield articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK geography Mid‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Handsworth, South Yorkshire is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Possible Copyright Violation

See Source page

disambiguation

To reduce confusion between two separate Handsworths I have made cross references in Handsworth, South Yorkshire which contains a St.Mary's Church to St. Mary's Church, Handsworth in Birmingham UK, and vice versa. If there is a better way to avoid confusing two St.Mary's Churches, both in areas called Handsworth - one in Birmingham and one in Sheffield - please edit the two entries more appropriately Sibadd 01:35, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary

Several changes in this edit, too many to fit in the little box:

The image width shouldn't be specified unless there's a very good reason to because it overides user specified default image widths, set e.g. by those with small monitors or poor eyesight. There's a policy page on this somewhere, but it's too much effort to find ;)
"Hansworth Today" differentiates from history, but otherwise seems to be a "misc" section, and anyway, not only would that material be perfect as an introduction, but it makes sense to combine the paragraphs! Single sentence paragraphs have, unfortunately, been proliferating.
"Small" is subjective. Readers can decide from the population data whether it's small, and if you want to aid them, you could for example provide a demographics section outlining population change, and comparing the population to the average Sheffield suburb.

Joe D (t) 22:50, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possible Copyright violation

This article was created with what looks very much like a cut and paste, of text which is claimed copyright by HECNet: see http://www.handsworth.org.uk/history/

The earliest wikipedia page cites no sources and has embedded headings as ordinary text.

The current page contains much of this text, still unsourced, though modified and formatted since. Chemical Engineer (talk) 20:22, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Handsworth, South Yorkshire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:22, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]