Jump to content

Talk:San Francisco Municipal Railway

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeSan Francisco Municipal Railway was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 12, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
February 5, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed
On this day...Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on December 28, 2011, December 28, 2012, and December 28, 2014.
Current status: Former good article nominee


[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 12 external links on San Francisco Municipal Railway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:51, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on San Francisco Municipal Railway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:16, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Some proposed changes to fare information

[edit]
  • Information to be added or removed: Replace “One fare entitles a rider to unlimited vehicle transfers for the next 90 to 120 minutes.” with “One fare entitles a rider to unlimited vehicle transfers within the allotted time period. All travel on the fare must be completed within 120 minutes.” or similar text that conveys the same meaning.
  • Explanation of issue: (1) Transfers are now based on 120 minutes, not the former 90 minutes. (2) The existing text implies that if a transfer occurs before the end of the 120-minute period that the fare-payer can continue riding past the end of the 120-minute period without paying an additional fare. That is not the case. The total elapsed time between purchasing the fare and completing travel must be 120 minutes or less to be within the fare policy.
  • References supporting change: https://www.sfmta.com/fares/single-ride-adult, https://www.sfmta.com/fares/single-ride-discount, https://www.sfmta.com/sites/default/files/reports-and-documents/2018/08/fare_policy_18.0816.pdf

CharlesBelovSFMTA (talk) 18:16, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reply 25-FEB-2019

[edit]

  Edit request implemented    Spintendo  19:45, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Still has incorrect information

[edit]

{{request edit}} The correction to 120 minutes was implemented, thank you. However, it still reads that unlimited transfers are available for that period, while the actual case is that unlimited travel is available for that period. If someone transfers just before the 120 minutes expire, they cannot continue riding past the 120-minute mark without paying an additional fare. CharlesBelovSFMTA (talk) 21:28, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've indicated that in the Notes section.  Spintendo  22:46, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry, I missed that. Thank you. CharlesBelovSFMTA (talk) 23:15, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect logo shown

[edit]

The logo shown appears to be an attempt by someone to recreate the Muni logo as an SVG file, but the curves are wrong. Please replace with the correct logo, which I have uploaded to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Muni_worm_logo.png CharlesBelovSFMTA (talk) 00:44, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can you provide an SVG version (or a link to a PDF document that I could extract an SVG version from)? Or alternately, a diagram showing proper dimensions and color for the logo, so that I can modify the current file? There is no sense using a small PNG image with a false copyright claim when we can use an SVG with proper public domain claim. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:37, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
WP:LOGOS states "Logos uploaded to Wikipedia must be low-resolution and no larger than necessary." If I were to upload an SVG logo, it would be resolution-independent, which would violate that policy. CharlesBelovSFMTA (talk) 20:31, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reply 25-MAY-2019

[edit]

  Unable to implement  

  • The current version of the logo, an svg file:

  • The proposed version of the logo, a png file:

The licensing provided with the current svg version is valid. The licensing provided with the proposed png version is incomplete. Thus, the file that is the proposed version is currently slated for deletion, which will likely occur anytime after Saturday, June 1, 2019 if no further clarifications to its licensing are added to the file.

Regards,  Spintendo  20:11, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Muni shares four Metro stations with BART (how is this counted?)

[edit]

This statement has no citation, and it's unclear how this count was arrived at. Muni Metro shares four stations with BART in the Market Street subway -- Embarcadero, Montgomery, Powell, and Civic Center -- but the J, K, and M lines connect with BART at Balboa Park station.

In my personal experience it's very confusing to transfer between BART and Muni Metro at Balboa Park, but is there some reason this station is seemingly omitted from the number of stations shared with BART? — Preceding unsigned comment added by MrEricSir (talkcontribs) 14:28, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Look at a map, sure they 'connect' with BART down at Balboa, but they are pedestrian transfers - the four downtown are actually the same underground station structures, you just exit one paid area and enter another. Regardless that whole confusing section seems to be gone now. Brianmarx (talk) 19:37, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]