Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emmanuel Christian Academy

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - kept - SimonP 03:00, May 23, 2005 (UTC)

Emmanuel christian academy

Non-notable school of 500 students. Delete. Neutrality^talk 13:47, May 17, 2005 (UTC)

Keep. Beats me how people can refer to a school that size as "non-notable". In any case it's verifiable, which is the criterion we use on Wikipedia. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 14:21, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep schools in wikipedia. --Howrealisreal 14:35, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Neutrality should perhaps read WP:POINT - this flood of VfDs is a somewhat unreasonable. Lupin 14:48, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, vanity - but nominator should be warned for WP:POINT. R adiant _* 15:03, May 17, 2005 (UTC)
Keep, as with all the others. - SimonP 15:05, May 17, 2005 (UTC)
No Vote, I am uncertain. Hm. Delete, not really anything too... um... nothing that really jumps out at me. Master Thief Garrett 15:08, 17 May 2005 (UTC) (see vote below)[reply]
Delete The movie theater down the street sees more patrons than this per day. That doesn't make it notable. --InShaneee 15:10, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Tony Sidaway. Kappa 16:09, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/Consolidate into article on area private schools, or else keep. This school thing could go on for years... — RJH 16:26, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Longhair | Talk 17:05, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, expand and echo Radiant & Lupin. Too many nominated at once to expand all at once. Secondary schools are notable. --BaronLarf 20:16, May 17, 2005 (UTC)
Delete doesnt ind notab Gazpacho 20:22, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Useless collection of generic facts about an insignificant school. This is not an encyclopedia article. Individual schools are not inherently encyclopedic and there is nothing to distinguish insignificant schools like this one from thousands of nearly identical schools around the world. Gamaliel 20:30, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the schoolcruft. Ketsuban has spoken. The debate is over. 21:24, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Bogus (non-policy) mass nomination, clogging the VFD system - notability is still not a listed deletion criterion. Move to proper title that includes location - David Gerard 23:20, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable. Quale 00:11, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as with others. Christopher Parham 00:33, 2005 May 18 (UTC)
Merge with Springfield, Ohio per my school article policy. Kelly Martin 02:23, May 18, 2005 (UTC)
Merge as per Kelly Martin. Master Thief Garrett 03:37, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or transwiki to wikischools then delete. Gmaxwell 05:13, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Verifiable and NPOV. Schools are an excellent entry point for new Wikipedians. Further, VfD spamming must have NO reward. --Unfocused 14:33, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Similar number of pupils to the 3rd most famous school in England. CalJW 18:53, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not notable, pointless. CDThieme 01:28, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete = not notable. NoAccount 03:00, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
keep please it is notable Yuckfoo 22:00, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. (1)We don't even have a policy about schools yet, (2)schools are important and should be included, (3)this massive deletion campaign is terrible. Introduce a limit of 3 vfd nominations per day. Project Schoolwatch. --Zantastik 22:22, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.