Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lauren Ashley Gentile
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD 16:07, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Another vanity page, the same as Lauren Gentile, also made by User:68.215.84.79. --Xanzzibar 06:29, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. BLANKFAZE | (что??) 06:43, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Postdlf 06:58, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. --MarkSweep 07:34, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. --BD2412- gab 09:10, 2005 Mar 24 (UTC)
- Delete. Or encourage User:68.215.84.79 to create an account and make this material into a user page, where it would be perfectly appropriate. This is one of the best vanity pages I've ever seen. It's a well-written vanity page. It is a vanity page full of skilful irony and dry humor. It is a vanity page full of a deep understanding of the human condition. It is a vanity page such as Jane Austen might have written, before she became notable. If I were rating vanity pages, I'd give it a 9.5. No! make that a 9.7. This superb vanity page deserves the kindest, gentlest, and most appreciative deletion. Dpbsmith (talk) 23:26, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- See my vote on the Ella Peterson VfD: delete roughly from behind, but if possible first Userfy this superb 9.7-scoring vanity page. Barno 16:01, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Speedy Delete for both. Zscout370 00:13, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)- Vanity pages are not proper candidates for speedy deletion. The criteria for speedy deletion are very restrictive. Dpbsmith (talk) 01:04, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- The reason I asked for a speedy, since there was two pages that dealt with the same person, with the same information. After I voted, I found out there was one more. Though the content has not be deleted before, I personally believe it would have been reposted under names like this one. If you still think it is not worthy of a speedy, then I will change my vote to a simple Delete. Zscout370 01:13, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Vanity pages are not proper candidates for speedy deletion. The criteria for speedy deletion are very restrictive. Dpbsmith (talk) 01:04, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Comment If it is proven beyond reasonable doubt that the author is the same person, then with cases like these they should simply be moved to the editors userpage. Megan1967 03:38, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete vanity. Cute picture on the weblink though.Fawcett5 04:08, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.